2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of institutional delivery services in Kassala, eastern Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, almost 75% of women in Ethiopia deliver at home, a practical barrier in the reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality [3]. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Ethiopia utilization of facility-based delivery was affected by individual attributes (educational status (both), women's autonomy to make decisions on birth places, cultural and traditional beliefs, and wealth status) [4][5][6][7][8], obstetric attributes (parity and ANC use) [9] and barriers related to availability and accessibility of health services (unavailability and cost of transportation, distance to facility and limited knowledge about the benefits of institutional delivery [10][11][12][13]. Whereas: better education, higher socioeconomic status, urban residence, lower birth order, ANC visits, availability of transport, having good knowledge of obstetric complications, knowledge of BPCR, partners' involvement to seek obstetric assistance, and women's participation in social networks are the most identified facilitators associated with facility delivery utilization [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, almost 75% of women in Ethiopia deliver at home, a practical barrier in the reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality [3]. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Ethiopia utilization of facility-based delivery was affected by individual attributes (educational status (both), women's autonomy to make decisions on birth places, cultural and traditional beliefs, and wealth status) [4][5][6][7][8], obstetric attributes (parity and ANC use) [9] and barriers related to availability and accessibility of health services (unavailability and cost of transportation, distance to facility and limited knowledge about the benefits of institutional delivery [10][11][12][13]. Whereas: better education, higher socioeconomic status, urban residence, lower birth order, ANC visits, availability of transport, having good knowledge of obstetric complications, knowledge of BPCR, partners' involvement to seek obstetric assistance, and women's participation in social networks are the most identified facilitators associated with facility delivery utilization [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%