Use of Incinerator Bottom Ash for Frit Production

Barberio, Grazia; Buttol, Patrizia; Masoni, Paolo; Scalbi, Simona; Andreola, F.; Barbieri, Luisa; Lancellotti, Isabella

doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00224.x

Cited by 24 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(39,(102)(103)(104) Thus, the treatment of noncarcinogenic effects in LCA differs from RA. 22Based on these characteristics, current practice in LCA using a linear dose-response is commonly referred to as the "less is better" approach, while the traditional RA approach considering threshold doses (9,51,83,101) has been referred to as an "only above threshold" approach. (36) This is one area where there is a clear difference between the information provided by RA and LCIA, and the framework proposes an integration of both approaches as a means to yield more informative assessments.…”

Section: Incorporating Risk Screeningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals

Csiszar

Meyer

Dionisio

et al. 2016

Environ. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a decision-making tool that accounts for multiple impacts across the life cycle of a product or service. This paper presents a conceptual framework to integrate human health impact assessment with risk screening approaches to extend LCA to include near-field chemical sources (e.g., those originating from consumer products and building materials) that have traditionally been excluded from LCA. A new generation of rapid human exposure modeling and high-throughput toxicity testing is transforming chemical risk prioritization and provides an opportunity for integration of screening-level risk assessment (RA) with LCA. The combined LCA and RA approach considers environmental impacts of products alongside risks to human health, which is consistent with regulatory frameworks addressing RA within a sustainability mindset. A case study is presented to juxtapose LCA and risk screening approaches for a chemical used in a consumer product. The case study demonstrates how these new risk screening tools can be used to inform toxicity impact estimates in LCA and highlights needs for future research. The framework provides a basis for developing tools and methods to support decision making on the use of chemicals in products.

show abstract

Section: Incorporating Risk Screeningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals

Csiszar

Meyer

Dionisio

et al. 2016

Environ. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The production of glass, ceramic and glass-ceramic structures with the fly ash addition is a widely studied subject in the materials science other recycling related affairs (Karamanova & Karamanov, 2009), (Erol M. Et al 2004) . Production of glass-ceramic structures from fly ashes has widely studied in recent years (Kim, Kim, Oshikawa, & Ikeda , 2003) (Cheng, Ueng, Chen, & Chiu, 2002) (Barberio, et al, 2010). The researches state that the composition of fly ash, the fuel of the thermal power plants since the composition of fly ash is affected by the different fuel types, have high effect for glass-ceramic properties.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Fly Ash Containing Catalytic Vitreous Enamel Coatings

Çiçek¹

2019

European Journal of Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fly ashes are the by products from coal based raw materials of thermal power plants that are gathered with electro filters or cyclones. Due to the utilization possibility of fly ash particles varying applications Fly Ash is considered as a byproduct of thermal power plants. İnvestigation on possible use of fly ash in enamel production are reported. New enamel frits compositions were developed in order to utilize the fly ash in most efficient in their glassceramic matrix. Catalytic enamel frits were selected to be studied due to their high metallic oxide amounts compared to other enamel frits. Fly ash particles are added to the developed catalytic enamel frit in 1 wt.%, 5 wt.% and 10 wt.% in order to investigate the possible alternative usage of fly ash by products. Catalytic activity of the prepared enamels tested with ISO 8291 Test Standard and also, the surface roughness and gloss values are determined. Gloss values were increased compared to the standart enamel compositions in a tolerable amount. 1 wt.%, 5 wt.% and 10 wt.% fly ash addition, the gloss values was increased up tp 3.3, 10 and 36.6 %, respectively. Surface roughness of the standard enamel coating was 96 µm and with 1 wt.%, 5 wt.% and 10 wt.% fly ash addition the roughness values increase 14.5, 28.1 and 33.3 %. The results showed that addition of fly ash into the catalytic enamel frit did not change the ISO 8291 Test results which are 8 cycles for all the samples. Fly ash particles did not distort the catalytic enamel layer and did not impair the catalytic properties.

show abstract

“…Many experimental works have shown the feasibility of bottom ash reuse in concrete mixtures [6][7][8][9][10], road base and sub-base course [11][12][13], and glass or glass-ceramic materials [14][15][16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of concrete production with solid residues obtained from fluidized-bed incineration of MSW-derived solid recovered fuel (SRF)

Collivignarelli

Abbà

Sorlini

et al. 2016

J Mater Cycles Waste Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of solid residues derived from municipal solid waste-derived solid recovered fuel incinerated in a circulating fluidized-bed boiler for concrete production. The concrete mixtures casted by partially replacing the natural aggregates with bottom ash (27 %) and exhausted sand (13 %), according to the European standards for concrete, may be classified in the C16/20 class. The leaching tests performed on monolithic concrete samples showed that the concentrations measured in the leachates were lower than limit values for waste recovery, with the only exception of nickel for the mixture made with the exhausted sand

show abstract

Use of Incinerator Bottom Ash for Frit Production

Cited by 24 publications

References 52 publications

Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals

Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals

Development of Fly Ash Containing Catalytic Vitreous Enamel Coatings

Evaluation of concrete production with solid residues obtained from fluidized-bed incineration of MSW-derived solid recovered fuel (SRF)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About