2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-014-0184-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolation to Predict the Optimal Strategy for Patients Switching from Efavirenz to Maraviroc or Nevirapine

Abstract: IVIVE modelling successfully predicted patient drug exposure. This modelling technique is able to inform the design of clinical studies, and allows assessment of pragmatic dosing strategies under complex therapeutic scenarios.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, several PBPK models for efavirenz were recently used to support the clinical pharmacology reviews of new drug applications with focus on assessing the modest CYP3A4 induction effect . There have been several studies in the literature that reported the application of PBPK models to predict the interindividual variability in efavirenz pharmacokinetics (PKs) due to CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics, and to support dose adjustment . A comparison of all available efavirenz models in the literature revealed that there are differences in several of the key model input parameters (e.g., plasma protein binding, CYP3A4/2B6 induction parameters).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, several PBPK models for efavirenz were recently used to support the clinical pharmacology reviews of new drug applications with focus on assessing the modest CYP3A4 induction effect . There have been several studies in the literature that reported the application of PBPK models to predict the interindividual variability in efavirenz pharmacokinetics (PKs) due to CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics, and to support dose adjustment . A comparison of all available efavirenz models in the literature revealed that there are differences in several of the key model input parameters (e.g., plasma protein binding, CYP3A4/2B6 induction parameters).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] There have been several studies in the literature that reported the application of PBPK models to predict the interindividual variability in efavirenz pharmacokinetics (PKs) due to CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics, and to support dose adjustment. [10][11][12] A comparison of all available efavirenz models in the literature revealed that there are differences in several of the key model input parameters (e.g., plasma protein binding, CYP3A4/2B6 induction parameters). These differences perhaps reflect the fact that many of these efavirenz models are "fit-for-purpose" and the aims of the simulations were different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrew Owen [ 42 , 43 ] described mathematical approaches in pharmacokinetics (PK), contrasting population PK (starting with clinical data and fitting a model) with physiological PK (predicting clinical outcome from models of transport data). Such PK models can already be used to simulate different treatment regimens and predict how they might work for patients with different transporter SNPs (single-nt polymorphisms) [ 42 , 43 ]. Secondly, multi-drug transporters are partially responsible for cancer drug resistance, which causes tens of thousands of cancer deaths each year.…”
Section: Abc Transporters In Health and Disease: From Bench To Bedsidmentioning
confidence: 99%