1994
DOI: 10.1016/0887-2333(94)90044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of in vitro methodology to predict the irritancy potential of surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mictrotox testing. Microtox TM is a bacterial toxicity test that has been used to predict skin sensitivity response (harshness) (29,30). The method, prescribed by Azur Environmental, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA), utilizes the luminescence response of the test organism Vibrio fischeri.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mictrotox testing. Microtox TM is a bacterial toxicity test that has been used to predict skin sensitivity response (harshness) (29,30). The method, prescribed by Azur Environmental, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA), utilizes the luminescence response of the test organism Vibrio fischeri.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting comparison was carried out between the effects of anions and cations of metals and their softness parameter, as a basis for predicting the adverse effects of metals in vivo (3). A number of series of chemicals, related by physicochemical properties or function, have been tested, including acids, alcohols, antibiotics and organic solvents (17), short-lived metabolites (21,22), surfactants (18), and volatile materials (26), and the first 50 MEIC chemicals (21), now plus 23 of the second 25 MEIC chemicals. One conclusion from these various studies is that comparisons within groups of related chemicals/formulations are more predictive of in vivo toxicity than an overall comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…result in a high rate of fluorescein leakage. The amount of fluorescein leakage does not correlate well with the degree of cell loss following surfactant treatment (12,17). It was observed that, in both of the media, the effectiveness of the barrier function meant that leakage was as low as 6% of the maximum across the insert membrane with no cells, a criterion employed to define an acceptable barrier function in MDCK cells (12,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been proposed to replace the Draize eye test, as recently reviewed (3,4), including the use of corneal epithelial cells (5-7) associated with specific assays, for example the fluorescein leakage assay (8)(9)(10), the resazurin reduction assay (11)(12)(13), and assays for glutathione (14) and total cellular protein (such as, the kenacid blue assay [15,16]). These are designed to evaluate both function/activity and viability on exposure to chemicals, and subsequent recovery from insult (17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%