2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01333-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of iGlarLixi for Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Japanese Clinical Practice: SPARTA Japan, a Retrospective Observational Study

Abstract: Introduction: Many individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) experience suboptimal glycemic control. Treatment intensification options include fixed-ratio combination products containing a basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, such as iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide). This study aimed to provide real-world evidence of the effect of iGlarLixi in Japanese clinical practice. Methods: SPARTA Japan was a non-comparative, observational study conducted at 27 institutions in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2), but the dose at the end of the treatment period was significantly higher in the group that had received C 10 U/day at baseline versus the group that had received \ 10 U/day (p \ 0.0001). Amongst participants who were receiving BI at baseline, the mean BI dose was 11.9 U/day in the FAS (as previously discussed in the primary SPARTA analysis [13]) and ranged from 8.9 to 12.2 U/day across applicable subgroups (Supplementary Fig. S3a).…”
Section: Dose Changesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…S2), but the dose at the end of the treatment period was significantly higher in the group that had received C 10 U/day at baseline versus the group that had received \ 10 U/day (p \ 0.0001). Amongst participants who were receiving BI at baseline, the mean BI dose was 11.9 U/day in the FAS (as previously discussed in the primary SPARTA analysis [13]) and ranged from 8.9 to 12.2 U/day across applicable subgroups (Supplementary Fig. S3a).…”
Section: Dose Changesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The rationale for sample size calculations for the primary analysis has been defined previously [13]. In the current report, all analyses are descriptive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations