2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: Friend or foe?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Furthermore, Candage et al describe wound-related complications in 54% of patients with multiple comorbidities; however, this includes grade-4 hernia patients with infected or contaminated wounds. 35 The current literature does not provide clear evidence regarding mesh selection for grade 2 or 3, intermediate-risk abdominal hernia patients. The senior author selected a biologic mesh to minimize complications in a patient population with multiple medical comorbidities given the likelihood of a failed prosthetic reconstruction; 78% of patients presented with a recurrent hernia and 12% already had an infected previous prosthetic mesh reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…27 Furthermore, Candage et al describe wound-related complications in 54% of patients with multiple comorbidities; however, this includes grade-4 hernia patients with infected or contaminated wounds. 35 The current literature does not provide clear evidence regarding mesh selection for grade 2 or 3, intermediate-risk abdominal hernia patients. The senior author selected a biologic mesh to minimize complications in a patient population with multiple medical comorbidities given the likelihood of a failed prosthetic reconstruction; 78% of patients presented with a recurrent hernia and 12% already had an infected previous prosthetic mesh reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8 Clinically, nonbiodegradable synthetic patches, such as polypropylene 9 , polyester, 10 and expanded poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (ePTFE) 11 , are associated with complications including seromas and fistula 12,13 , patient discomfort 14 , surgical site infections 12,15 , and limited physical activity of the patient due to poorer abdominal wall compliance 16 , whereas the weak mechanical properties, size limitation, and high cost of biological materials, such as acellular dermal matrix 17,18 and SIS 19,20 , limited their use. 21 A tissue engineering approach to hernia repair would be a promising alternative to meet current clinical needs through placing a biodegradable synthetic polymer-biological material blend patch at the abdominal wall site to provide temporary mechanical support and regenerate new abdominal muscles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Герніопластика з використанням алопласти-чних матеріалів вже є стандартом ведення хво-рих у багатьох країнах світу та широко застосо-вується завдяки кращій репарації післяоперацій-ної рани. Завдяки цьому спостерігається швид-кий розвиток та розробка різноманітних варіан-тів імплантатів [8][9][10], що значно утруднює вибір для клініцистів. На підставі проведеного аналізу літератури за останні 50 років Brown C.N.…”
Section: вступunclassified