Objective To assess the risk of further surgery amongst women who had an initial endometrial ablation (EA) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB).Design A retrospective cohort study using a national administrative database.Setting Population-based study of hospital care in the English National Health Service. Methods Multiple Cox regressions were performed to identify the risks of a further procedure, adjusted for age, social deprivation, year and type of initial EA, and presence of fibroids/polyps.Main outcome measures Time to repeat EA or hysterectomy after initial surgery.Results Of 114 910 women undergoing EA, 16.7% had at least one subsequent procedure within 5 years. Higher rates of subsequent surgery were associated with younger age at initial EA, with women aged under 35 years having an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.83 (95% CI 2.67-2.99), compared with women aged over 45 years. Women who had radiofrequency ablation were less likely to have subsequent surgery as compared with first-generation techniques (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.76). The rate of a subsequent hysterectomy within 5 years was 13.5%. Younger women (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.69) and those who had balloon, microwave, or radiofrequency ablation were less likely to have a second EA procedure, rather than a hysterectomy.Conclusions One in six women have further surgery after EA for HMB, which is a higher rate than reported in clinical trials. This risk of further surgery decreases with age.Keywords Endometrial ablation, heavy menstrual bleeding, hysterectomy.Please cite this paper as: Bansi-Matharu L, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahmood T, Templeton A, van der Meulen J, Cromwell D. Rates of subsequent surgery following endometrial ablation among English women with menorrhagia: population-based cohort study. BJOG 2013;120:1500-1507.