2011
DOI: 10.1177/1040638711416846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of high-resolution melting curve analysis to identify Mycoplasma species commonly isolated from ruminant, avian, and canine samples

Abstract: Abstract.A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay coupled with high resolution melting curve analysis (PCR-HRM) was developed for identifying and distinguishing Mycoplasma species commonly isolated from ruminant, avian, and canine samples. The real-time PCR used 1 set of universal primers specific for the spacer region between the 16S ribosomal RNA and the 23S ribosomal RNA genes; the melting curve analysis of the PCR product used a high-resolution melt fluorescent dye.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method reported by Boonyayatra et al (2012a) used amplification of 16S rDNA by PCR followed by complementary phenotypic assays to distinguish between Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma; however, the method did not further speciate and required additional culture for completion. Rebelo et al (2011) reported a relatively rapid method that employed PCR amplification of ITS followed by high resolution melt analysis; however, this method only identified Mycoplasma and analysis is difficult. Recently, a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry method for identification of ruminant Mycoplasma (Pereyre et al, 2013) and a rapid DNA microarray assay for identification of both Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma (Schnee et al, 2012) have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A method reported by Boonyayatra et al (2012a) used amplification of 16S rDNA by PCR followed by complementary phenotypic assays to distinguish between Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma; however, the method did not further speciate and required additional culture for completion. Rebelo et al (2011) reported a relatively rapid method that employed PCR amplification of ITS followed by high resolution melt analysis; however, this method only identified Mycoplasma and analysis is difficult. Recently, a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry method for identification of ruminant Mycoplasma (Pereyre et al, 2013) and a rapid DNA microarray assay for identification of both Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma (Schnee et al, 2012) have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Qualitative PCR and amplification of an approximately 500 base-pair (bp) segment of the 16S-23S bacterial intergenic spacer (IGS) region was performed to detect Mycoplasma spp. using a modification of previously published methods (Rebelo et al 2011). Reactions were prepared containing 12.5 mL of Amplitaq Gold 360 Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), 25 pmol each of a forward F1 (59-ACACCATGGGAGYTGGTAAT-39) and reverse R1 primer (59-CTCCWTCGACT-TYCAGACCCAAGGCAT-39), 10 mL of molecular-grade water, and 2 mL (approximately 7 ng to 38 ng) of nucleic acid extract.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of PCR has a higher sensitivity in comparison to conventional PCR. It also produces quicker results and can quantify DNA in tested samples [11, 12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%