Use of health technology assessment in decision making: Coresponsibility of users and producers?

Abstract

Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) is a policy-oriented form of research designed to inform decision-makers on the introduction, use, and dissemination of health technology. Whereas research on knowledge transfer has focused on knowledge producers, little attention has been given to the user's perspective. This study examines how health-care provider, administrator, and patient associations across Canada use HTA reports and the limitations they encounter when accessing and using scientific knowledge.Methods: This study draws from semistructured interviews (n = 42) conducted with three types of user, located in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Quebec. Applying well-established conceptual categories in knowledge utilization research, our qualitative analyses sought to define more precisely how HTA is used by interviewees as well as the most significant barriers they encounter.Results: The vast majority of users recognize the usefulness and credibility of HTA reports. Of interest, the way they use HTA takes different forms. Although administrators and health-care providers are in a better position than patient associations to act directly on HTA messages—making an instrumental use of HTA—we also found conceptual and symbolic uses across all groups. Our results also indicate that significant organizational, scientific, and material limitations hinder the use of scientific evidence. Overcoming such barriers requires a greater commitment from both HTA producers and users.Conclusions: This study argues that, to ensure better uptake of HTA, it should become a shared responsibility between HTA producers and various types of user.

A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers

“…In the case of the WHO, it was seen as unreliable, unsupportive, and with dubious claims to be evidence-based’ [31,44]. Other factors mentioned in connection with organisational and resource barriers included poor long term policy planning [45], inflexible and non-transparent policy processes [46,47] and in developing countries, lack of effective health care systems [24]. Leadership and authority were reported as facilitators, with emphasis on community leadership [48] and policy entrepreneurialism of policy champions [43,49].…”

Comparison of determinants of research knowledge utilization by practitioners and administrators in the field of child and family social services

“…Thus, practitioners would be concerned with integrating research knowledge into their regular practice. This presupposes the organizational ability to support the transformation of practitioners' clinical practices over time in accordance with evidence-based practices [44,45]. Conversely, program administrators would be more concerned with finding specific information to help them make short-term decisions regarding the best action to take, i.e.…”

"We noticed that suddenly the country has become full of MRI". Policy makers' views on diffusion and use of health technologies in Iran

“…Obviously, one requirement for producing such input is trained and skillful staff. Hivon et al [29] argue that there are three major limitations to the use of HTA--organizational, material and scientific. The absence of skilled staff with good knowledge and understanding of HTA is a scientific limitation which makes it difficult to produce context-specific input.…”