Advanced GNSS Tropospheric Products for Monitoring Severe Weather Events and Climate 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13901-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of GNSS Tropospheric Products for Climate Monitoring (Working Group 3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Station position repeatability was in general good both in the horizontal (≤ 0.005 m) and vertical (≤ 0.015 m) except for two stations (BOUL, OLVN). In a second step, a tighter range check completed with an outlier check were applied following the recommendations of Bock (2020a). The range check limits were [0.5, 3.0 m] on ZTD values and 0.01 m on formal errors.…”
Section: Gnss Data Quality Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Station position repeatability was in general good both in the horizontal (≤ 0.005 m) and vertical (≤ 0.015 m) except for two stations (BOUL, OLVN). In a second step, a tighter range check completed with an outlier check were applied following the recommendations of Bock (2020a). The range check limits were [0.5, 3.0 m] on ZTD values and 0.01 m on formal errors.…”
Section: Gnss Data Quality Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the distribution of formal errors helped to set the range limits for the post-processing data screening in order to reject outliers in the ZTD and position estimates (Bock, 2020). Due to the different statistical properties observed in the results discussed above, different thresholds were adopted for the two software packages and the three R/Vs:…”
Section: Data Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where h ERA5 and h GNSS are the geoid heights of the ERA5 grid point and of the GNSS antenna, respectively; T (h ERA5 ) and P (h ERA5 ) are the temperature and pressure from ERA5 at the model surface; g(h ERA5 ) = 9.8062 m s −2 is the gravity at the model surface; g atm = 9.7840 m s −2 is the approximated gravity of the centre of mass of the atmosphere (Nilson et al, 2013); and k 1 = 0.77643 K Pa −1 is a refractivity constant for dry air updated by Bock et al (2021) for the EUREC 4 A period. In the case that larger height differences are considered, a more accurate formulation of height correction should be applied such as that proposed in Bock (2020).…”
Section: Gnss Iwv Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERA5 fields were used with the highest temporal and spatial resolutions: 1-hourly and 0.25°x 0.25°, respectively. The refractivity coefficients and thermodynamics constants were updated from Bock (2020a) to account for the global CO 2 content for January 2020 (see the Appendix). The g m formula proposed by Bosser et al (2007) was used instead of the Saastamoinen (1972) one.…”
Section: Gipsy Repro1 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%