1999
DOI: 10.2144/99271bm04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of GFP as a Reporter for the Facile Analysis of Sequence-Specific Proteases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These type of fluorescent substrates have been used in both in vitro and cell based assays (10,28). In a related approach to that which we describe, a fluorescent or phage associated substrate is linked to an immobile support matrix, such as a bead, and enzyme mediated cleavage of a linking substrate molecule results in a change in fluorescence emission properties, or release of bound fluorophores or phages (24,(29)(30)(31). Although fluorescent quenched substrate libraries are a very powerful tool for investigation of enzymatic activity and specificity, potential disadvantages of using fluorophore based assays are the tendency of chromophores to interact with either the active site of the enzyme or the substrate (32), the limitations to short intramolecular distances due to the efficiency of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) as a function of the Forster distance (9), and the necessity for many cleavage reactions to occur to get a reasonable signal (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These type of fluorescent substrates have been used in both in vitro and cell based assays (10,28). In a related approach to that which we describe, a fluorescent or phage associated substrate is linked to an immobile support matrix, such as a bead, and enzyme mediated cleavage of a linking substrate molecule results in a change in fluorescence emission properties, or release of bound fluorophores or phages (24,(29)(30)(31). Although fluorescent quenched substrate libraries are a very powerful tool for investigation of enzymatic activity and specificity, potential disadvantages of using fluorophore based assays are the tendency of chromophores to interact with either the active site of the enzyme or the substrate (32), the limitations to short intramolecular distances due to the efficiency of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) as a function of the Forster distance (9), and the necessity for many cleavage reactions to occur to get a reasonable signal (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another fusion protein substrate has also been developed for in vitro analyzing SUMO-specific protease [17]. However, assays of these designed fusion protein substrates are inconvenient, because separation of the cleaved and uncleaved products is required to quantify the cleavage [12,13,18-20]. In addition, the ability of several protein substrates is further limited by their low stability under relatively high temperature or in the presence of denaturant [7,12-14].…”
Section: Backgoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike a short peptide substrate with convenient probes such as a fluorogenic moiety, protease assays for macro-protein substrates heavily rely on either chromatographic separation techniques or SDS-PAGE analysis for the size alteration of the substrates. Recently, an assay using enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fluorescence to detect cleavage by Thrombin has been reported (18). However, this assay has a major limitation-insolubility of the substrate, which limits its utility.…”
Section: Research Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%