2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment – A review of mechanical properties and microstructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
110
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
110
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been considered as green alternative of Portland cement due to its lower carbon footprint and lesser embodied energy requirement during production (Yang et al, 2013;Gartner and Hirao, 2015). Additionally, it exhibits superior properties such as good mechanical strength, excellent chemical and fire resistant properties than OPC binder, and its tailor made properties make suitable for wide range of applications (Fernández-Jiménez et al, 2006;Park et al, 2016;Hassan et al, 2019;Luhar et al, 2019). It is defined as a class of binder material containing -Si-O-Al-bond in a tri-dimensional network structure, formed by the interaction of alkaline solution with a powder source containing Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 such as calcined clay, fly ash, blast furnace slag, silico-manganese slag, Pb-Zn slag, red mud, mining waste etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been considered as green alternative of Portland cement due to its lower carbon footprint and lesser embodied energy requirement during production (Yang et al, 2013;Gartner and Hirao, 2015). Additionally, it exhibits superior properties such as good mechanical strength, excellent chemical and fire resistant properties than OPC binder, and its tailor made properties make suitable for wide range of applications (Fernández-Jiménez et al, 2006;Park et al, 2016;Hassan et al, 2019;Luhar et al, 2019). It is defined as a class of binder material containing -Si-O-Al-bond in a tri-dimensional network structure, formed by the interaction of alkaline solution with a powder source containing Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 such as calcined clay, fly ash, blast furnace slag, silico-manganese slag, Pb-Zn slag, red mud, mining waste etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymer technology provides a sustainable solution towards waste utilization, pollution mitigation and resource conservation by using waste materials as precursor (Fernández-Jiménez and Palomo, 2003;Onisei et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2017;Koplík et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2019;Xia et al, 2019). As a result, a huge number of industrial byproducts and wastes have been examined for solidification/stabilization through geopolymer technology (Xu et al, 2014;Nazari and Sanjayan, 2015;Djobo et al, 2016;Lirer et al, 2017;Kiventera et al, 2018;Koplík et al, 2018;Nath, 2018;Hassan et al, 2019;Luhar et al, 2019;Nie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although usage of geopolymer concrete is still in the beginning stage, however, recently, many structures have been successfully constructed utilizing geopolymer concrete [19]. Some of these geopolymer composites are reinforced box culverts, concrete pipes, pavements, structural elements, precast concrete such as railway sleeper and electric power pole and marine construction, reinforced box culverts, precast footway panels, the airport in southeast Queensland, Australia, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the chemical composition, fly ash is categorized as either class F or class C. The previous studies on the GPC reported that the use of F class of FA on the production of GPC has comparable or superior mechanical properties to the OPC concretes [21,22]. In India, the manufacture of clay bricks requires 540 million tonnes of clay for manufacturing 180 billion tonnes of clay brick per year, makes 26,800 hectares of land barren, and requires 30 million tonnes of coal equivalent, generates around 27 million tonnes of CO 2 [19,23,24]. Annually, a 10-12% replacement with fly ash will consume 30-32 million tonnes of fly ash, save coal and environment and yield a benefit of 310 crores by decrease cost in the production of blocks [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymers (GP) are considered a valid and sustainable alternative to OPC as they show properties suitable for diverse applications in construction [9][10][11] such as a fast setting time, low volumetric shrinkage, outstanding mechanical performance, and high resistance to chemicals and ageing [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Additionally, GP manufacture is highly cost-effective and simple, and is claimed to generate lower CO 2 emissions than OPC [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%