2013
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of genomic panels to determine risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the general population: a targeted evidence-based review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate that the genome of the sequenced individual, who suffers from Type 2 diabetes, harbors as many as 72 (out of the 159) variants previously associated with Type 2 diabetes. This observation has implications on global initiatives that strive to develop genome panels to help in genetic susceptibility testing for Type 2 diabetes [ 59 , 60 ]. Several commercial companies offer genome panels incorporating up to 38 variants designed for different ethnicities [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate that the genome of the sequenced individual, who suffers from Type 2 diabetes, harbors as many as 72 (out of the 159) variants previously associated with Type 2 diabetes. This observation has implications on global initiatives that strive to develop genome panels to help in genetic susceptibility testing for Type 2 diabetes [ 59 , 60 ]. Several commercial companies offer genome panels incorporating up to 38 variants designed for different ethnicities [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational materials about genetics and T2DM and general information about testing provided by the research coordinator and genetic counselor at the beginning of the study may have provided sufficient information for participants. Lastly, as there have been questions and concerns about the clinical utility or usefulness of genomic risk for common diseases like T2DM (EGAPP 2007; Prudente et al 2012; Palomaki et al 2013), participants may not have perceived the results as significant for their health, and thus, did not warrant seeking additional information. Our study population’s high e-health literacy, experience and reported ease with finding online health information in the past makes it unlikely they would have had difficulty searching for additional information if desired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, 39% of 5297 individuals switched between risk categories once and 11% switched twice. A study by Palomaki et al [ 139 ] of type 2 diabetes, genomic risk profiles advertised by DTC-GT companies highlighted a lack of analytical validity and clinical utility in the tests through the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group. This approach was established to support the development of a systematic process for assessing the available evidence for GT in clinical practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%