2015
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Genetically Encoded Calcium Indicators (GECIs) Combined with Advanced Motion Tracking Techniques to Examine the Behavior of Neurons and Glia in the Enteric Nervous System of the Intact Murine Colon

Abstract: Genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators (GECIs) have been used extensively in many body systems to detect Ca2+ transients associated with neuronal activity. Their adoption in enteric neurobiology has been slower, although they offer many advantages in terms of selectivity, signal-to-noise and non-invasiveness. Our aims were to utilize a number of cell-specific promoters to express the Ca2+ indicator GCaMP3 in different classes of neurons and glia to determine their effectiveness in measuring activity in enteric ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(138 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, electrical stimulation of enteric neurons resulted in prompt GCaMP3 rises in enteric glial cells within myenteric ganglia. These results are in line with what we observed using Wnt1|GCaMP3 mice(Fung et al, 2017) and with the Ca 2+ indicator dye Fluo-4(Boesmans, Martens, et al, 2013) and are comparable to other studies using GCaMP3(Hennig et al, 2015) and GCaMP5G-tdT (McClain & Gulbransen, 2017). Notably, the differences with other studies in terms of expression pattern and response kinetics could be due to the…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, electrical stimulation of enteric neurons resulted in prompt GCaMP3 rises in enteric glial cells within myenteric ganglia. These results are in line with what we observed using Wnt1|GCaMP3 mice(Fung et al, 2017) and with the Ca 2+ indicator dye Fluo-4(Boesmans, Martens, et al, 2013) and are comparable to other studies using GCaMP3(Hennig et al, 2015) and GCaMP5G-tdT (McClain & Gulbransen, 2017). Notably, the differences with other studies in terms of expression pattern and response kinetics could be due to the…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The main type was the standard deviation map, which was generated by calculating the standard deviation of fluorescence intensity at every pixel immediately prior to the application of the stimulus (0.5–1.0 s) extending to 30–50 s depending on the stimulus used. Standard deviations were color coded (“Fire” CLUT) to more accurately portray the relative intensity of the signal in muscle cells in relation to background noise (Hennig et al, 2015). To better appreciate the heterogeneity of muscle fiber responses during different stimulation paradigms, ST maps were colored and overlaid and summary images were created using different statistical procedures including average intensity and the standard deviation of intensity (e.g., Figures 6B,C ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image sequences were recorded at 25 frames per second, and were exported as 8-bit TIFF files into custom-written software (Volumetry G8d). A Gauss filter (3x3 pixel, sd = 1.0) was applied to reduce camera noise, and motion-correction routines were used to stabilize neural and Schwann cell elements in the movie (see Hennig et al, 2015). Changes in background fluorescence were stabilized by subtracting the average intensity near the main phrenic nerve branch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%