1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002160050832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of GC and equilibrium calculations of CO 2 saturation index to indicate whether freshwater bodies in north-eastern Germany are net sources or sinks for atmospheric CO 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our system, the dissolved pCO 2 was about 50% undersaturated compared to atmospheric concentrations, which is common for Lake Stechlin. 42 Thus, the existing gas bubbles would be similarly undersaturated with respect to atmospheric concentrations, resulting in an apparent CO 2 flux into the water. Each 1 mm diameter bubble at equilibrium would be undersaturated relative to atmospheric equilibrium by ∼ −4.2 × (Figure 4b).…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our system, the dissolved pCO 2 was about 50% undersaturated compared to atmospheric concentrations, which is common for Lake Stechlin. 42 Thus, the existing gas bubbles would be similarly undersaturated with respect to atmospheric concentrations, resulting in an apparent CO 2 flux into the water. Each 1 mm diameter bubble at equilibrium would be undersaturated relative to atmospheric equilibrium by ∼ −4.2 × (Figure 4b).…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind speed data were recorded by ultrasound at lake-center monitoring stations every 10 min by a meteo multiprobe (ecoTech). The CO 2 concentration in surface waters (or partial pressure of CO 2 , P CO 2 ) was calculated from DIC concentrations, pH, and temperature, adjusting for the concentration of calcium ions (CaCO 0 3 , CaHCO z 3 , and CaOH + ), following Gelbrecht et al (1998). Conservative P CO 2 concentrations are calculated for each lake accounting for a possible measured pH bias of 0.2 from DOC effects (Herczeg et al 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, karst water is generally alkaline. The content of CO 2− 3 C in dissolved inorganic C is very small, so we did not need to consider it in the DIC calculation Gelbrecht et al, 1998). In this study, we used the formula F 1 below to calculate net carbon uptake by karst, using the estimates of mean annual [HCO3 − ], ion concentration during the dry-wet season, and the mean daily underground flow discharge.…”
Section: Determination Of Water Samples and Dic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%