2006
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of G‐CSF in Matched Sibling Donor Pediatric Allogeneic Transplantation: A Consensus Statement from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Transplant Discipline Committee and Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) Executive Committee

Abstract: Preliminary studies indicate that G-CSF-primed marrow harvesting may result in a graft with increased mononuclear cells collected, increased CD34(+) stem and progenitor cell dose and a potential for more rapid engraftment. Increased cell dose plus other potential positive effects of G-CSF priming have resulted in improved survival in non-randomized preliminary studies. These benefits may be available without the increased risk of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) that is experienced with allogeneic peri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Several reports on adult donors have shown an incidence of life-threatening or debilitating complications of BM donation in 0.3%-0.4% of the donors. 11,[25][26][27] Death has been reported as contributing to an overall risk of 0.003%-0.02% in adults after BM collection. 19,28 The risk of death and SAE after PBSC collection in adults was 4-and 2-fold higher, respectively, compared with BM harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 Several reports on adult donors have shown an incidence of life-threatening or debilitating complications of BM donation in 0.3%-0.4% of the donors. 11,[25][26][27] Death has been reported as contributing to an overall risk of 0.003%-0.02% in adults after BM collection. 19,28 The risk of death and SAE after PBSC collection in adults was 4-and 2-fold higher, respectively, compared with BM harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Based on experience gained over the past 30 years, the use of BM from an HLA-identical sibling donor is considered the standard of care worldwide for children undergoing HSC transplantation. 11 Nevertheless, an increasing use of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) among matched-sibling pediatric transplantations was reported to the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium between 1994 and 2002, which accounted for more than 23% of all pediatric HSC collections. 12,13 In the same period, PBSCs were collected from 4% of pediatric matchedsibling donors in EBMT centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BM harvesting is a safe procedure that primarily has mild and transient side effects. As most of the donors in this study were smaller than their respective recipients, we used G-CSFstimulated BM because it is a suitable alternative to unstimulated BM if the donor is young or small [28] and G-CSF administration is safe in pediatric patients [29][30][31]. Adverse events were rare in our pediatric donors, and a small proportion of donors underwent red blood cell transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For approximately one-third, the HSC donor is also a child, 1 typically a healthy sibling who undergoes BM harvest or large volume apheresis for collection of peripheral blood stem cells. Recognizing that HSC donors face risks [2][3][4][5] (Table 1) without the potential for direct medical benefit, the American Academy of Pediatrics recently published guidelines specifying when minors may ethically serve as HSC donors for a standard (nonresearch) transplant. 6 This raises the need for guidance on when minors may donate HSCs in the research setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%