Use of Foaming Disinfectants and Cleaners to Reduce Aerobic Bacteria and Salmonella on Poultry Transport Coops

Abstract

Simple SummaryChicken coops are rarely washed and can soil poultry carcasses with fecal bacteria that may make people sick. Our laboratory applied two commercially available products to experimentally contaminated coops. One product contained bleach, potassium hydroxide and a foaming agent. The other product contained vinegar and hydrogen peroxide and was mixed with a detergent. Both products were applied using a firefighting apparatus known as a compressed air foam system (CAFS). These materials were washed away using a garden hose or pressure washer as the treatments called for. Surface swabs were collected prior to and after each treatment to determine the reduction of bacteria on the surface, which would be an indicator of sanitation. We found that both treatments significantly made the surface cleaner when compared to water alone. The application of these products via a CAFS may be a practical and expedient way to clean and disinfect poultry cages.AbstractTransport coops are infrequently washed and have been demonstrated to cross-contaminate broiler carcasses. We hypothesized that peracetic acid or a chlorinated cleaner, commonly used within poultry processing plants, can also be used to disinfect transport coops when applied via a compressed air foam system (CAFS). A mixture of fresh layer manure and concentrated Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) was evenly applied to the floors of four pre-cleaned transport coops and allowed to dry for thirty minutes. Treatments consisted of a (1) water rinse only, (2) product application with a water rinse, (3) product application followed by power washing and (4) power washing followed by application of product. Each foaming treatment was applied with a compressed air foam system and allowed 10 min of contact time. Samples were aseptically collected from the transport coops prior to and following treatment using a sterile 2 × 2-inch stainless steel template and a gauze swab pre-enriched with buffered peptone water. The chlorinated cleaner significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerobic bacteria and ST by 3.18 to 4.84 logs across application methods. The peroxyacetic acid (PAA) disinfectant significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerobic bacteria and ST by 3.99 to 5.17 logs across application methods. These data indicate that a compressed air foam system may be used in combination with a commercially available cleaner or disinfectant to reduce aerobic bacteria and ST on the surfaces of commercial poultry transport coops.

An improved cleaning system to reduce microbial contamination of poultry transport crates in the United Kingdom

“…Furthermore, individual measures such as adding detergent or disinfectant or raising the temperature of the wash water did not, by themselves, result in a significant reduction in microbial counts. Recently, other authors have shown that using compressed air foam systems with a cleaner (peracetic acid or chlorinated) may be used to successfully reduce aerobic bacteria in poultry transport crates (Hinojosa et al , ). However, on those studies, the crates were artificially contaminated and the efficacy of the cleaning methods in reducing viral contamination was not addressed.…”

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Pre-harvest Meat Safety Interventions to Control Foodborne Pathogens in Broilers: a Systematic Review

“…[15-34, 35•, 36-38] and Salmonella spp. [15,19,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] were carried out in thirteen and eleven different countries, respectively. For both pathogens, most of the pre-harvest interventions were assessed in lab-based challenge trials (65% and 82%), while the remaining trials were field trials where no experimental infection was performed.…”

Factors associated with Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli during downtime in commercial broiler chicken barns in Ontario

“…For E. coli , the effect of the sanitation procedure depended on the sampling point, in that compared with presanitation samples collected from dry-cleaned barns, the E. coli concentration was lower in postsanitation samples collected from disinfected barns. Davies and Wray (1995) showed that S. enterica and coliform populations increase during the pressure washing process often used before disinfection, whereas others have shown that using a high-pressure rinse before disinfection was more effective against E. coli ( Berrang and Northcutt, 2005 ) and S. enterica ( Hinojosa et al., 2018 ) than a low-pressure rinse. Gibson et al.…”