2021
DOI: 10.1080/10641955.2021.1921791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of FMF algorithm for prediction of preeclampsia in high risk pregnancies: a single center longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction model was established by the Fetal Medicine Foundation, and a revised algorithm using maternal characteristics and medical history, MAP, uterine artery PI, and serum PlGF identifies preterm PE with 75% sensitivity and EOPE with 90% sensitivity when the false positive rate is set at 10% [ 12 ]. It was also shown to be equally accurate in other cohort studies [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. We currently use this prediction model online ( [accessed 1 July 2022]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This prediction model was established by the Fetal Medicine Foundation, and a revised algorithm using maternal characteristics and medical history, MAP, uterine artery PI, and serum PlGF identifies preterm PE with 75% sensitivity and EOPE with 90% sensitivity when the false positive rate is set at 10% [ 12 ]. It was also shown to be equally accurate in other cohort studies [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. We currently use this prediction model online ( [accessed 1 July 2022]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The most commonly used algorithm was established by FMF, which combined maternal risk factors, MAP, UtA‐PI, PlGF with or without sFlt‐1. Although it seems to outperform the traditional risk‐factor screening approach in the prediction of PE, when screening high‐risk pregnant women, the FMF algorithm presented low sensitivity (35%) 15 . In addition, the prediction performance of the FMF model is even lower when applied to populations other than the original population from which they were derived 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although it seems to outperform the traditional risk-factor screening approach in the prediction of PE, when screening high-risk pregnant women, the FMF algorithm presented low sensitivity (35%). 15 In addition, the prediction performance of the FMF model is even lower when applied to populations other than the original population from which they were derived. 26 Taken together, despite the investigation of numerous markers and algorithms, a reliable prediction model for PE has not been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations