Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02682-9_167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Fluidized Bed Combustion Ash and Other Industrial Wastes as Raw Materials for the Manufacture of Calcium Sulphoaluminate Cements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the OPC manufacturing process, CSA cements exhibit the following environmentally friendly features: (I) reduced limestone requirement (usually <35%), and therefore less kiln thermal input and CO2 generation; (II) lower synthesis temperatures (about 150 °C-200 °C) and more friable clinkers (lower grinding energy required); (III) larger clinker dilution with additions of sulfate sources; (IV) greater use of industrial wastes, especially as kiln feed components [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. To further decrease CO2 emissions, CSA cements can be blended with various SCMs and/or mineral additions [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the OPC manufacturing process, CSA cements exhibit the following environmentally friendly features: (I) reduced limestone requirement (usually <35%), and therefore less kiln thermal input and CO2 generation; (II) lower synthesis temperatures (about 150 °C-200 °C) and more friable clinkers (lower grinding energy required); (III) larger clinker dilution with additions of sulfate sources; (IV) greater use of industrial wastes, especially as kiln feed components [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. To further decrease CO2 emissions, CSA cements can be blended with various SCMs and/or mineral additions [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, the cement production all over the world was equal to around 4.10 billion tons and its contribution to the anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions was estimated to be as high as 8% [1][2][3]. With a growing focus on energy efficiency and sustainable production [4], technological advancements in cement production have revealed methods to reduce CO 2 emissions in the following ways: (a) more efficient manufacturing processes; (b) targeted use of non-traditional fuels and raw materials (e.g., non-carbonated CaO sources instead of limestone); (c) carbon capture and storage technologies [5]; (d) increased utilization of blended Portland cements; (e) further use of special hydraulic binders (such as alkali-activated and magnesium-based cements as well as calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA), belite and belite-calcium sulfoaluminate (BCSA) binders) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce its carbon footprint, the cement industry is exploring how to manufacture OPC with less impact on the environment through a switch to: (I) alternative fuels, (II) reduction in thermal energy demand, (III) use of non-carbonated CaO sources instead of L, (IV) decrease in clinker to cement ratio, (V) application of carbon capture and storage technologies to cement plants [6], and (VI) development of low-CO 2 non-Portland binders (e.g., alkali-activated, Mg-based cements, calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) and belite-CSA (BCSA) binders) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%