1994
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990160204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of ferro‐electric liquid crystal shutters for time‐resolved fluorescence microscopy

Abstract: A technique is described to modify a standard fluorescence microscope for time-resolved visualization of delayed luminescing substances with decay times from 50 ps to several milliseconds. The modification consists of synchronized operation of a mechanical shutter, positioned in an aperture plane in the excitation pathway, simultaneously with a ferro-electric liquid crystal (FLC) shutter on the emission side. Operation of the microscope is through a microprocessor interfaced keypad by which all timing paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the ultimate detection sensitivity in fluorescence microscopy is mainly determined by the nonspecific background signals caused by autofluorescence of the biological objects, fixative-induced fluorescence, and the natural fluorescence of components such as microscope objectives, immersion oil, and optical filters (Aubin 1979;Jovin et al 1989). These fast-decaying types of autofluorescence can be suppressed by application of time-resolved microscopy (Zotikov and Polyakov 1977;Seveus et al 1992;Marriott et al 1991Marriott et al ,1994Verwoerd et al 1994;Hennink et al 1996) using a delayed luminescent label (Hemmilä et al 1982;Seveus et al 1992;Hennink et al 1996) as reporter molecule bound to immunospecific reagents or nucleic acid probes (Diamandis et al 1988;Savitski et al 1989;Beverloo et al 1990;Marriott et al 1991Marriott et al ,1994Seveus et al 1992; de Hennink et al 1996). Most of the applications of time-resolved microscopy reported thus far use europium chelates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the ultimate detection sensitivity in fluorescence microscopy is mainly determined by the nonspecific background signals caused by autofluorescence of the biological objects, fixative-induced fluorescence, and the natural fluorescence of components such as microscope objectives, immersion oil, and optical filters (Aubin 1979;Jovin et al 1989). These fast-decaying types of autofluorescence can be suppressed by application of time-resolved microscopy (Zotikov and Polyakov 1977;Seveus et al 1992;Marriott et al 1991Marriott et al ,1994Verwoerd et al 1994;Hennink et al 1996) using a delayed luminescent label (Hemmilä et al 1982;Seveus et al 1992;Hennink et al 1996) as reporter molecule bound to immunospecific reagents or nucleic acid probes (Diamandis et al 1988;Savitski et al 1989;Beverloo et al 1990;Marriott et al 1991Marriott et al ,1994Seveus et al 1992; de Hennink et al 1996). Most of the applications of time-resolved microscopy reported thus far use europium chelates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enables measuring the lifetime on a pixel by pixel basis. The method we used, referred to as t h eresolved fluorescence microscopy, takes advantage of a large difference in lifetime of the specific luminescence and the non-specific background fluorescence (2,12,13,17,24,(28)(29)(30)33). In this detection scheme, pulsed excitation is used in combination with gated detection of the emission.…”
Section: (19)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various concentrations of each component were tested; the pH of the final solution was kept in the 5.9-6.4 range. (2) In experiments intended to determine the limit of luminescence detection and the luminescence time-dependence, the concentrations of Eu-Mac or EuCl 3 were varied as appropriate, while the composition of the solution was kept constant.…”
Section: Cofluorescence Solutions For Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%