2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
120
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The study obtained and applied the results of exploratory factor analysis (with varimax rotation) for the 30 observed variables. The loading factor of each of the 30 indicators was above 0.5 therefore, it was deemed successful and statistically relevant [49]. Babin and Anderson [46] identified loadings such as ±0.30=minimal, ±0.40=important and ±0.50= essentially substantial using another thumb rule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study obtained and applied the results of exploratory factor analysis (with varimax rotation) for the 30 observed variables. The loading factor of each of the 30 indicators was above 0.5 therefore, it was deemed successful and statistically relevant [49]. Babin and Anderson [46] identified loadings such as ±0.30=minimal, ±0.40=important and ±0.50= essentially substantial using another thumb rule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFA data analysis was utilized in factor analysis of the 38 observed indicators for the indicator grouping process. We considered only factors with a loading factor of ≥0.3 [31]. There were 26 such indicators for the measurement model analysis process.…”
Section: Normality and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items with factor loadings less than 0.4 were deleted one by one in increasing order of factor loadings and factor analyses were run several times to get a simple structure (Maskey, Fei, & Nguyen, 2018). Maskey et al (2018), in a review of 35 EFA based studies, found that a factor loading of 0.4 is widely taken as a cut-off value in such studies (Cerit, 2000;Pantouvakis, 2006;Dahl, Fenstad, & Kongsvik, 2014;Field, 2009). In addition, items were also checked for their Eigenvalue respective impact on the cumulative scale reliability (α = .70).…”
Section: Preliminary Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%