1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70412-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Coronary artery stenoses are rare in patients without CAC in most studies. 15,26 However, Rubinshtein et al 27 found that CAD was evident on cardiac CT angiography (CTA) in 7% of patients with CAC scores of 0. These data are not directly comparable to the findings of our study because of the differences in study populations and end points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 Coronary artery stenoses are rare in patients without CAC in most studies. 15,26 However, Rubinshtein et al 27 found that CAD was evident on cardiac CT angiography (CTA) in 7% of patients with CAC scores of 0. These data are not directly comparable to the findings of our study because of the differences in study populations and end points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,15 Our study evaluates the integration of cardiac CT for CAC detection into the assessment and triage of patients with chest pain in the ED and examines its value in long-term outcome in patients.…”
Section: Mayo Clinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron beam computer tomography had excellent negative predictive value but low specificity in patients with chest pain. 30,31 MRI surmounts some of these barriers. Many hospitals have MRI capability for other emergencies such as stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of 568 low-risk ED patients with chest pain, those with negative coronary CTA did not have any adverse outcomes (nonfatal AMI or death) within 30 days of the index ED visit [25]. Prior studies have shown that coronary CTA has high diagnostic accuracy (82-100% sensitivity, 82-98% specificity, negative predictive value of 95-100%) in low-risk patients for detection of coronary artery disease [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Coronary CTA has been shown to be as safe [17] and more cost effective [18] than other methods of evaluating these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%