2012
DOI: 10.1002/arp.1424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Edge Delineating Methods in Interpreting Magnetic Archaeological Prospection Data

Abstract: Various edge delineating methods (edge mappers) are tested on different types of synthetic data produced by calculating the response of a model of buried ancient ruins. The model was constructed to resemble a commonly occurring situation with ruins of two historical phases buried one beneath the other. These weak signals of relatively small wavelengths of the archaeological prospection comprise tough tests for the mappers considered. Additionally, a particular mapper, the balanced horizontal gradient magnitude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods have been suggested to delineate geophysical anomalies in raster data, most notably based on the calculation of gradients, for example the normalized gradient (Ma and Li, 2012) or the analytical signal (Nabighian, 1972;Tabbagh et al, 1997). Other methods are linked to the specific properties of certain geophysical data, such as Euler deconvolution of magnetometer surveys (Reid et al, 1990) or other complex parameters (Stampolidis and Tsokas, 2012). However, all these methods become unreliable when the noise level in the data (the signal-to-noise ratio) becomes very poor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been suggested to delineate geophysical anomalies in raster data, most notably based on the calculation of gradients, for example the normalized gradient (Ma and Li, 2012) or the analytical signal (Nabighian, 1972;Tabbagh et al, 1997). Other methods are linked to the specific properties of certain geophysical data, such as Euler deconvolution of magnetometer surveys (Reid et al, 1990) or other complex parameters (Stampolidis and Tsokas, 2012). However, all these methods become unreliable when the noise level in the data (the signal-to-noise ratio) becomes very poor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2e, g), which is in the case of the transformation of the TDX much more expressive. The special transformation TDXAS (Stampolidis and Tsokas, 2012), which should be seen rather as a mathematical filter (multiplication of fields AS and TDX) is very interesting. We find the physical reality of this transformation very difficult.…”
Section: Calculations Of Transformed Fields From Complete Bouguer Anomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation of the total horizontal derivative (THD) for the grid is: THDxy=()fx2+()fy2where f ( x , y ) is the apparent conductivity response (Everett, 2013). Use of the total horizontal derivative is common in archaeology with magnetic data sets, both simulated (Stampolidis and Tsokas, ) and archaeological (Büyüksaraç et al ., ). The THD is rarely used with EM data; an exception is Beamish (), who recently used the THD with airborne EM data.…”
Section: Geophysical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%