2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of eddy current testing method in detection and evaluation of sensitisation and intergranular corrosion in austenitic stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For metallographic examinations, the welded samples of facet 50 × 10 × 3 mm 3 were obtained in the transverse direction of weldment and polished on successive papers up to 2000 grit emery paper followed by velvet cloth polishing with 0.75 µm alumina slurry. In order to reveal the microstructures, electrolytic etching was performed in accordance with the ASTM A-262 practice A test 14) . Microhardness measurement was carried out in the transverse direction of weldments at regular intervals using the Vickers hardness testwer at 500 g/20 s 15) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For metallographic examinations, the welded samples of facet 50 × 10 × 3 mm 3 were obtained in the transverse direction of weldment and polished on successive papers up to 2000 grit emery paper followed by velvet cloth polishing with 0.75 µm alumina slurry. In order to reveal the microstructures, electrolytic etching was performed in accordance with the ASTM A-262 practice A test 14) . Microhardness measurement was carried out in the transverse direction of weldments at regular intervals using the Vickers hardness testwer at 500 g/20 s 15) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences in the morphology of corrosion attack are due to chromium carbide precipitation in the sensitised sample. Areas depleted of alloying elements (Cr, Mo) appear surrounding chromium carbides (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) and these areas are preferential zones for corrosion attack. In the sensitised samples corrosion attack grows along these areas that are in the grain boundaries.…”
Section: Ecs Transactions 41 (24) 45-54 (2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in austenitic stainless steels, an improper heat treatment in the temperature range between 500 and 900 ºC causes chromium and carbon to react at grain boundaries and form chromium carbides. Concomitant with the formation of chromium, depletion zones appear at the adjacent zones (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Then, the corrosion resistance of the steels decreases as a result of the precipitation of chromium carbides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austenitic stainless steels possess excellent resistance to general corrosion; however, when they are subjected to a treatment like welding in the temperature range between 500°C and 800°C, they suffer from corrosion in forms of intergranular corrosion and intergranular stress corrosion cracking. This is generally attributed to sensitization as a result of chromium depletion which in turn is due to the chromium carbide precipitation in the grain boundaries [1][2][3][4][5]. Sensitization as a serious and momentous problem during welding of stainless steel has not been completely prevented by conventional techniques such as reduction of carbon content (below 0.03 wt.%), addition of strong carbide formers (such as titanium, niobium or zirconium), and solution heat treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%