1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Dynamic Contact Angle Profile Analysis in Studying the Kinetics of Protein Removal from Steel, Glass, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Polypropylene, Ethylenepropylene Rubber, and Silicone Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible restructuring effects at the glass interface was eliminated since a solvent‐swollen network (i.e., not a neat film) was produced in the mold, removed and then dried in air. As expected, SMP1–4 are hydrophobic as indicated by θ static values above 90°45 and also higher than that of pure PCL due to the presence of hydrophobic PDMS segments. θ static of SMP4 , perhaps due to the increased crosslink density and PCL crystallinity, was slightly higher than that of the silicone control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Possible restructuring effects at the glass interface was eliminated since a solvent‐swollen network (i.e., not a neat film) was produced in the mold, removed and then dried in air. As expected, SMP1–4 are hydrophobic as indicated by θ static values above 90°45 and also higher than that of pure PCL due to the presence of hydrophobic PDMS segments. θ static of SMP4 , perhaps due to the increased crosslink density and PCL crystallinity, was slightly higher than that of the silicone control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Surface reorganization may also be characterized via dynamic contact angle analysis. θ adv represents the hydrophobic surface characteristics, whereas hydrophilicity is reflected by θ rec 48. Hysteresis (θ δ = θ adv − θ rec ) is typically used as an indicator of surface reorganization 49.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…θ adv is an indicator of the hydrophobicity or low surface energy, whereas θ rec reflects the hydrophilic nature of the surface 53. Hysteresis (θ Δ = θ adv − θ rec ) is a product of surface chemical heterogeneity, roughness, reorganization, hydration, or contamination 54.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%