Mechanical Engineering 2012
DOI: 10.5772/34636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Discounted Cash Flow Methods for Evaluation of Engineering Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the third place is the ARR and IRR is the least used and trusted method by the Palestinian corporations. The above result is aligned by many literature mentioned above such as Pšunder (2012), Shinoda (2010), Khamees et al (2010) and Brijlal and Quesada (2009). On the other hand, many of previous literature have an opposite result such Ryan and Ryan (2002), Kengathran (2016), Shaban et al (2017) and El-Daour and Abushaaban (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the third place is the ARR and IRR is the least used and trusted method by the Palestinian corporations. The above result is aligned by many literature mentioned above such as Pšunder (2012), Shinoda (2010), Khamees et al (2010) and Brijlal and Quesada (2009). On the other hand, many of previous literature have an opposite result such Ryan and Ryan (2002), Kengathran (2016), Shaban et al (2017) and El-Daour and Abushaaban (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Pšunder (2012) concludes the increase of use of NPV and the drawback in using the IRR method. That because the IRR method leads into an incorrect conclusion in decision making process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gas fan at the feed end pulls air through the kiln. The air leaving the kiln is sent to a cyclone to remove coarse particles (<1 mm), and then to a baghouse for removal of finer particles (<30 m) before being released to the atmosphere (Pšunder, 2012). The preoxidized fine chromite ore (OC) is then discharged into a bunker and transported to the prereduction raw material storage heaps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hitch and Dipple (2012), it is fairly simple to appraise a project in terms of revenue versus cost; however, it is imperative to consider the time value of money and the influence that substantial upfront capital costs may have. Pšunder (2012) pointed out that the use of DCF methods for engineering project evaluation has increased significantly in the last few decades. Financial analysis through DCF modelling is currently the most commonly used methodology for appraising potential investments, due to its ability to quantify the added value to shareholders (Hitch and Dipple, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation