Use of different spray volumes and hydraulic nozzles in air-assisted electrostatic insecticide application technologies to control coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) populations

Abstract

Chemical control is essential for efficient pest management in coffee crops. Application technologies should safely deliver insecticides to the target whilst protecting the environment, insecticide applicators, and consumers. To achieve these goals, application volumes, hydraulic nozzles, and application techniques should be evaluated. This study assessed the biological efficiency of different spray volumes and spray nozzles used to apply insecticides to control coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) populations. We applied insecticides using a hydropneumatic sprayer with and without an electrostatic spraying system. The experiment followed a randomized block factorial design (2 × 2 + 1) and included two types of spray nozzles [a hollow cone spray nozzle (JA1) and a hollow cone spray nozzle with air induction (TVI)], two spray volumes (200 and 400 L ha-1), one additional treatment (SPE2 nozzle with a 200 system 200 L ha-1), and six replicates. We assessed the control efficiency of the different application methods by evaluating the percentage of fruits damaged 20 and 40 days after the date of application. The spray volume did not affect the biological efficiency of pest control, and the lower spray volume (200 L ha-1) was effective in the control of coffee berry borers. Application of insecticides using coarse droplets was more efficient than the application using very fine and fine droplets. The TVI hydraulic spray nozzle effectively controlled coffee berry borers at 200 and 400 L ha-1. The electrostatic application system performed similarly to the conventional system in terms of the control of the coffee berry borers, and was less efficient than the conventional system under some operational conditions.

Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Deposition Coverage of Air-Assisted Electrostatic Spray on Tomato Leaves

“…In addition, air-assisted electrostatic spraying technology also inherits many factors that can affect the deposition effect of air-assisted spray and electrostatic spray. These influencing factors mainly include charged voltage, spray distance, spray pattern, air velocity and spray pressure [19][20][21].…”

“…Neto et al compared the effects of different spray volumes and charges on spray deposition [20]. Zampiroli et al evaluated the control effect of different spray rates and different nozzles [21]. These studies mainly compared the different spray pressures, different air pressures, different types of nozzles, charge sizes and other factors in the spray deposition effect.…”