Abstract:Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the white population. Nonsurgical treatments are first-line alternatives in superficial BCC (sBCC); therefore, differentiating between sBCC and non-sBCC is of major relevance for the clinician. Scraping cytology possesses several advantages, such as an earlier diagnosis and scarring absence, in comparison to a biopsy. Nevertheless, previous studies reported difficulties in differentiating the different BCC subtypes. The objective of this … Show more
“…In cases of dermoid cysts or implantation cysts, the smear showed a mixture degenerated epithelial cells and keratinous material, a picture found also by [16], but the cell block also usually failed due to the keratinous material.In cases of atypical lipomas, FNAC smear showed a very useful picture; pleomorphic, hyperchromatic lipoblasts, mucoid background; the cell block did not add a more information. In cases of basal cell carcinoma; FNAC smear showed malignant cells with basophilic cytoplasm; the same results were found by [17], but the orientation of cells appeared in the cell block with peripheral palisading. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma, the malignant epithelial cells and the individual cell keratinization appeared in the smear.…”
Background: Evaluation of patients with cutaneous or subcutaneous nodules, especially if they are multiple, is a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to investigate smears and cell blocks and compare them with examination of tissue biopsies.Methods: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and cell blocks were done for 225 cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules. Furthermore, histopathological examination was conducted using biopsies.Results: According to tissue biopsy, benign lesions constituted the most common finding in 180 (80%) cases. The detected cases were lipoma in 35 (15.5%) cases, adipose tissues in 30 (13.3%) cases, 20 fibro lipomas (8.8%), 20 fibromas (8.8%), 5 juvenile fibroma (2.2%), neurofibroma in 5 cases (2.2%), sebaceous cyst in 25 cases (11.1%), implantation cyst, or dermoid cyst 20 cases (8.8%), pilomatrixoma 5 cases (2.2%), seborrheic keratosis10 cases (4.4%) and Madura foot (actinomycosis) in 5 cases (2.2%). Intermediate lesions of atypical lipoma were found in 20 cases (8.8%). Malignant lesions were 25 cases (11.11%) as follows: 10 cases (4.4%) basal cell carcinoma, 10 cases (4.4%) squamous cell carcinoma and 5 cases (2.2%) basosquamous cell carcinoma. For FNAC smear examination, the sensitivity test was 83.01% and the specificity was 16.66%. For cell blocks examination, the sensitivity and specificity tests were 97.77%, and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion:Smear cytology is an easy and quick test for diagnosing skin nodules. Performance of cell blocks improves sensitivity and specificity of smear outcome, but both should be attempted, because the smear may be ineffective in some cases while a cell block cannot be performed in others.malignancy [1]. People can experience a wide range of growths and
“…In cases of dermoid cysts or implantation cysts, the smear showed a mixture degenerated epithelial cells and keratinous material, a picture found also by [16], but the cell block also usually failed due to the keratinous material.In cases of atypical lipomas, FNAC smear showed a very useful picture; pleomorphic, hyperchromatic lipoblasts, mucoid background; the cell block did not add a more information. In cases of basal cell carcinoma; FNAC smear showed malignant cells with basophilic cytoplasm; the same results were found by [17], but the orientation of cells appeared in the cell block with peripheral palisading. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma, the malignant epithelial cells and the individual cell keratinization appeared in the smear.…”
Background: Evaluation of patients with cutaneous or subcutaneous nodules, especially if they are multiple, is a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to investigate smears and cell blocks and compare them with examination of tissue biopsies.Methods: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and cell blocks were done for 225 cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules. Furthermore, histopathological examination was conducted using biopsies.Results: According to tissue biopsy, benign lesions constituted the most common finding in 180 (80%) cases. The detected cases were lipoma in 35 (15.5%) cases, adipose tissues in 30 (13.3%) cases, 20 fibro lipomas (8.8%), 20 fibromas (8.8%), 5 juvenile fibroma (2.2%), neurofibroma in 5 cases (2.2%), sebaceous cyst in 25 cases (11.1%), implantation cyst, or dermoid cyst 20 cases (8.8%), pilomatrixoma 5 cases (2.2%), seborrheic keratosis10 cases (4.4%) and Madura foot (actinomycosis) in 5 cases (2.2%). Intermediate lesions of atypical lipoma were found in 20 cases (8.8%). Malignant lesions were 25 cases (11.11%) as follows: 10 cases (4.4%) basal cell carcinoma, 10 cases (4.4%) squamous cell carcinoma and 5 cases (2.2%) basosquamous cell carcinoma. For FNAC smear examination, the sensitivity test was 83.01% and the specificity was 16.66%. For cell blocks examination, the sensitivity and specificity tests were 97.77%, and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion:Smear cytology is an easy and quick test for diagnosing skin nodules. Performance of cell blocks improves sensitivity and specificity of smear outcome, but both should be attempted, because the smear may be ineffective in some cases while a cell block cannot be performed in others.malignancy [1]. People can experience a wide range of growths and
“…Predicting the recurrence risk of BCCs before treatment had always been a research hotspot. Pasquali et al 4 use cytology to diagnosis superficial BCC, which is susceptible of nonsurgical treatment, and found an inverse correlation between the diagnosis of superficial BCC and the presence of mucus, dehiscence, and atypical grade in the basal cells. Wortsman et al 14 reported that a higher hyperechoic spots count was found in high‐risk BCCs, with sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 53% for predicting high‐risk BCCs using cut‐off point ≥7 hyperechoic spots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Preoperative biopsy is mainly used to identify highrisk from low-risk BCC in clinical practice, but biopsy requires manipulation of the sample and often leave scarring, which is best avoided if BCC is susceptible to nonsurgical treatment, especially on the face. 4 Furthermore, preoperative biopsy represents only one sample of the tumor and may not include all the histological characteristics of the entire lesion. 5 A new noninvasive technique to determine the risk of BCC recurrence prior to treatment will undoubtedly be of great help in the development of clinical treatment plans.…”
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of high‐frequency ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) in quantitative differential diagnosis of high‐risk and low‐risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).
Methods
A total of 52 BCCs confirmed by surgical pathology were studied. Taking pathologic subtypes as reference, all the cases were classified as high‐risk BCCs or low‐risk BCCs. High‐frequency ultrasound parameters and SWE parameters recorded preoperatively were retrospectively analyzed. The differences of two groups were compared.
Results
There were 12 high‐risk BCCs and 40 low‐risk BCCs. The maximum infiltration depth (MID) and average Young's modulus (Eave) of high‐risk BCCs were 5.76 ± 2.56 mm and 31.61 ± 12.36 kPa, whereas of low‐risk BCCs were 4.29 ± 1.77 mm and 20.04 ± 4.74 kPa, respectively, P < .05. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of MID and Eave were 0.714 and 0.811, P > .05. Taking 5.5 mm of MID and 24.45 kPa of Eave as the threshold for the diagnosis of high‐risk BCCs, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 58.3%, 82.5%, 76.9% and 75.0%, 82.5%, 80.8%, P > .05.
Conclusions
The MID and Eave of the lesion can be used to determine the recurrence risk of BCCs and provide a reference for the development of individualized treatment plans.
“…To our knowledge, the most commonly described sample collection technique is scrape cytology. With this technique, the tissue is obtained by scraping the tumor or scratching a part of the lesion off, both performed with a scalpel blade (5,6). Imprint smear cytology is a useful alternative for easily exfoliating ulcerated lesions.…”
Basal cell carcinoma is the most frequently occurring cancer in humans. In light of its vast prevalence, this disease causes a substantial burden on the quality of life of patients. Histopathologic examination is currently the gold standard for diagnostic confi rmation and a requisite for therapeutic planning. Cytology possesses several advantages compared to biopsy. This is namely due to its minimal invasiveness, absence of scarring, improved aesthetic outcome, cost-effectiveness, and procedural simplicity. This review focused on contemporary evidence on basal cell carcinoma cytology to provide a comprehensive description of the technique with practical insights for specifi c clinical scenarios. This review also aimed to delineate and discuss evidence gaps and potential novel applications of this technique in the context of recent advances in cytopathology, dermatosurgery, molecular targeted therapy, and precision medicine (Tab. 2, Ref. 43).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.