Use of CT and MR imaging in radiation therapy planning of imaging‐diagnosed canine intracranial meningioma achieves better tumor coverage than CT alone

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective, secondary analysis study was to quantify the dosimetric impact of the lack of interobserver agreement on gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for canine meningioma. This study used a previously reported population of 13 dogs with GTVs contoured on CT alone and on registered CT‐MR by 18 radiation oncologists. The “true” GTV was generated for each dog using a simultaneous truth and performance‐level estimation algorithm, and “true” brain was defined as the whole brain minus true GTV. Treatment plans were generated for each dog and observer combination, using criteria applied to the observer's GTV and brain contours. Plans were then categorized as a pass (met all planning criteria for true GTV and true brain) or fail. A mixed‐effects linear regression was performed to examine differences in metrics between CT and CT‐MR plans and mixed‐effects logistic regression was performed to examine differences in percentages of pass/fail between CT and CT‐MRI plans. The mean percent coverage of true GTV by prescribed dose was higher for CT‐MR plans than for CT plans (mean difference 5.9%; 95% CI, 3.7–8.0; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the mean volume of true brain receiving ≥24 Gy and in maximum true brain dose between CT plans and CT‐MR plans (P ≥ 0.198). CT‐MR plans were significantly more likely to pass the criteria for true GTV and true brain than CT plans (OR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02–3.01; P = 0.044). This study demonstrated significant dosimetric impact when GTV contouring was performed on CT alone compared with CT‐MR.