1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199609)10:5/6<677::aid-cem468>3.3.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of correspondence analysis partial least squares on linear and unimodal data

Abstract: Correspondence analysis partial least squares (CA-PLS) has been compared with PLS conceming classification and prediction of unimodal growth temperature data and an example using infrared (IR) spectroscopy for predicting amounts of chemicals in mixtures. CA-PLS was very effective for ordinating the unimodal temperature data and the results indicated that CA-PLS is effective in treating the arch effect, thus avoiding the detrending procedure often used on ecological data sets, at least when one basic underlying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10) shows a distinctive arch. Initially, it was thought that this is indicative of the horsehoe effect because of the distortion of the data as a result of nonlinearity in spectral regions when using absorbances covering large regions of contiguous wavenumbers [34,35]. Analysing these plots without knowledge of this effect could lead one to believe there is a connection between the high and low viscous samples because of their scoring on LV2.…”
Section: Partial Least Squares Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) shows a distinctive arch. Initially, it was thought that this is indicative of the horsehoe effect because of the distortion of the data as a result of nonlinearity in spectral regions when using absorbances covering large regions of contiguous wavenumbers [34,35]. Analysing these plots without knowledge of this effect could lead one to believe there is a connection between the high and low viscous samples because of their scoring on LV2.…”
Section: Partial Least Squares Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method works to predict the beetle community from the variables on the vegetation structure or the environment but not to predict the beetle community from the plant community data. The reasons are twofold: (1) canonical correspondence analysis breaks down when the number of predictor variables, the individual plant species in our case, is larger than the number of sites, and (2) the method uses linear combinations-weighted sums (Jongman et al 1995)-of the predictor variables, which does not work well when the community data in the predictor role show a unimodal structure, a strong qualitative nature and/or are sum constrained, i.e., when the predictor community is better analyzed by a correspondence analysis technique than by a linear technique such as principal components analysis , Frisvad and Norsker 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WA-PLS is popular in palaeoecology for reconstructing palaeoenvironments from fossil assemblages (Birks 1998). WA-PLS is called correspondence analysis partial least squares by Frisvad and Norsker (1996). The community data take the role of response variables in CCA-PLS and the role of predictor variables in WA-PLS (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%