2012
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in clinical staging of asymptomatic breast cancer patients to detect asymptomatic distant metastases

Abstract: Abstract. The use of computed tomography (CT) with regards to the clinical staging of patients with asymptomatic breast cancer has been on the increase in clinical practice. However, the benefits of routine CT have yet to be fully clarified. This study investigated the value of employing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to screen for distant metastases in patients with asymptomatic breast cancer. The clinical records of 483 patients with asymptomatic breast cancer who underwent CECT at a single institution between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, LVI can be diagnosed only by postoperative histopathology, and preoperative prediction is extremely difficult (14,15). Compared with conventional CT, CECT can better distinguish normal tissues from tumors, and perform better in detecting tumors, showing tumor extent and staging (16,17). Yin et al (18) explored the correlation of triple-phase multi-slice CT scan with intratumor LVI of progressive gastric cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, LVI can be diagnosed only by postoperative histopathology, and preoperative prediction is extremely difficult (14,15). Compared with conventional CT, CECT can better distinguish normal tissues from tumors, and perform better in detecting tumors, showing tumor extent and staging (16,17). Yin et al (18) explored the correlation of triple-phase multi-slice CT scan with intratumor LVI of progressive gastric cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent study, the false-positive rate for the total population was 8.5% on CT scan and 7.7%, 9.0% and 8.7% in stages I, II and III, respectively (11). Due to the retrospective nature of our study, we were not able to accurately determine the false-negative and falsepositive rate of each imaging modality.…”
Section: The Prevalence Of Metastases and Corresponding Confidence Inmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In our study, the prevalence of metastases in pT2pN1 (stage IIB) was 3.49% (95% CI=1.96-6.14%) in the analysis of M1 and 6.35% (95% CI=4.15-9.60%) in the analysis of M1 12 . Given a false-positive rate of 9-14% in stage II breast cancer, the risk of overdiagnosing metastasis is higher than the chance of detecting true metastatic disease (11,17,18). For pT2pN1, the benefit of baseline staging must be carefully weighed against the potential disadvantages.…”
Section: The Prevalence Of Metastases and Corresponding Confidence Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Tanaka et al . ). Mammography is the mainstay of surveillance imaging with 8–50% of ipsilateral recurrences and 18–80% of contralateral metachronous cancer detected by mammography alone (Arasu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%