2001
DOI: 10.7748/ns2001.07.15.42.39.c3052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research

Abstract: This article describes the application of constant comparative analysis, which is one method that can be used to analyse qualitative data. The need for data analysis to be congruent with the overall research design is highlighted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
203
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
203
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst this method is central to grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1967, Strauss 1987, Glaser 1992, it is also fundamental to other areas of qualitative research (Hewitt-Taylor 2001, Boeije 2002). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this method is central to grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1967, Strauss 1987, Glaser 1992, it is also fundamental to other areas of qualitative research (Hewitt-Taylor 2001, Boeije 2002). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 We used constant comparative methods to examine data across cases at the same time and reviewed interview responses after coding to ensure no themes were overlooked. 20 …”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was repeated until no new codes were emerging. Using a similar process, the coded data were grouped into broader categories with the highest level of abstraction (22). To ensure the accurate inclusion of all data in the extracted categories and to improve the classification of the data, the transcripts and the extracted codes were reviewed several times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview transcripts were analyzed using constant comparative analysis (22). The interviews were transcribed verbatim into Microsoft Word 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%