2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0ce00416b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of confocal fluorescence microscopy to compare different methods of modifying metal–organic framework (MOF) crystals with dyes

Abstract: Dye modified MOF microcrystals were characterized by fluorescence microscopy (FM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) which visualized the position and distribution of fluorescent dyes encapsulated into MOF crystals and provided proof for selective, post-synthetic covalent modification of the external surface of MOF crystals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to further enrich or expand the functionalization of MOFs, in an approach similar to zeolites [24][25][26] , new synergistic properties have been achieved by incorporating functional species into MOFs to form composite materials that cannot be obtained from the parent MOF counterparts 27 . The incorporation of functional components into MOFs is typically accomplished by one of three methods: the incorporation of inorganic nodes through ion exchange or in situ doping 28,29 ; organic ligand modification 30,31 or the encapsulation of functional components 27 . Currently, the encapsulation process is widely used to incorporate heteroparticles with new functions into MOFs because the former two methods are limited to covalent bonding and coordination chemistry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to further enrich or expand the functionalization of MOFs, in an approach similar to zeolites [24][25][26] , new synergistic properties have been achieved by incorporating functional species into MOFs to form composite materials that cannot be obtained from the parent MOF counterparts 27 . The incorporation of functional components into MOFs is typically accomplished by one of three methods: the incorporation of inorganic nodes through ion exchange or in situ doping 28,29 ; organic ligand modification 30,31 or the encapsulation of functional components 27 . Currently, the encapsulation process is widely used to incorporate heteroparticles with new functions into MOFs because the former two methods are limited to covalent bonding and coordination chemistry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b). Interestingly, we observed the blue shifted peak at 505 nm5758 (green line) for FITC tagged UIO-66-NH 2 MOF in comparison to expected parent FITC peak at 540 nm (black line). It is also confirmed that UIO-66-NH 2 MOF has its own fluorescence peak (red line) but at significantly lower wavelength, 430 nm59 compared to 505 nm peak of FITC analog.…”
Section: Characterization Of Functionalized Nanomofsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The selective absorption of dyes into MOF pores of different sizes has been postulated as a means of separation [10]. In some cases, absorption into the MOFs is limited, but dyes can still be included into MOFs by co-precipitation [11,12]. For example, fluorescein only diffuses into the outer layer of [Zn 4 O(bdc) 3 ] (MOF-5, bdc = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate), but when introduced into the reaction mixture it is incorporated throughout the crystals [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%