1989
DOI: 10.1177/154193128903300524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Computer Graphics and Cluster Analysis in Aiding Relational Judgment

Abstract: An experiment is conducted to investigate the use of computer graphics and cluster analysis in aiding human relational judgment. The experimental stimuli were similarity matrices from real-world data sources. The experimental tasks required the subjects to detect the number of clusters or to judge the similarity value between a designated pair of objects i n the displayed matrix. Each matrix was either ordered randomly or arranged according to the results of cluster analysis. Each matrix was displayed in one o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown stereo viewing to be a powerful technique for displaying depth information [McAllister 1993;Wickens et al 1989], and stereo viewing has been used as a control condition, or baseline, for studying other 3D display techniques ]. Many studies do indicate the benefits of stereoscopic viewing in perceiving, recognizing, grasping, and/or understanding object shapes [Brown and Gallimore 1995;Hubona et al 1997;McWhorter et al 1991;Sollenberger and Milgram 1993;Ware and Franck 1996;Zhai et al 1996], although some of the studies do not support the superiority of stereopsis [Gallimore and Brown 1993] as a depth cue, while others suggest that these benefits are task specific [Liu and Wickens 1992;Wickens et al 1994]. However, stereopsis does provide depth cues about object shape that are absent without stereopsis.…”
Section: Dominant Depth Cuesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Studies have shown stereo viewing to be a powerful technique for displaying depth information [McAllister 1993;Wickens et al 1989], and stereo viewing has been used as a control condition, or baseline, for studying other 3D display techniques ]. Many studies do indicate the benefits of stereoscopic viewing in perceiving, recognizing, grasping, and/or understanding object shapes [Brown and Gallimore 1995;Hubona et al 1997;McWhorter et al 1991;Sollenberger and Milgram 1993;Ware and Franck 1996;Zhai et al 1996], although some of the studies do not support the superiority of stereopsis [Gallimore and Brown 1993] as a depth cue, while others suggest that these benefits are task specific [Liu and Wickens 1992;Wickens et al 1994]. However, stereopsis does provide depth cues about object shape that are absent without stereopsis.…”
Section: Dominant Depth Cuesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The data here are somewhat mixed. On one hand, Liu and Wickens (1992) found that a mesh surface connecting data points in 3D space did support subjects' ability to identify clusters in a relational database. On the other hand, Wickens and Todd (1990) failed to find a similar 3D benefit to information integration of a surface that connected four data points in a 3D database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This could be because occlusion as a visual cue is strengthened when contours are enhanced, which, in turn, provides a strong clue about the relative location of the cylindrical tubes even in the absence of other cues, whereas stereopsis alone may not provide much information about the depth when the visual scene is featureless. In fact, the benefits of stereopsis have been shown to be task dependent [Tendick et al 1997;Thomas et al 2005;Liu and Wickens 1992]. In Kersten-Oertel et al [2014], for instance, stereopsis was shown to have no benefit in perceiving relative depth.…”
Section: Depth Perception Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%