2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-5091-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of chitosan and β-tricalcium phosphate, alone and in combination, for bone healing in rabbits

Abstract: The aim of this research was to evaluate the process of bone regeneration in rabbits, using chitosan and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) independently and in combination. A total of 12 New Zealand rabbits of both sexes, with average weight of 3.0 ± 0.57 kg were used. Animals were randomly divided into two experimental time points, with six animals euthanized 45 days after surgery and six euthanized 90 days after surgery. We performed two osteotomies in each tibia. The left tibia was used for the chitosan (QU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of approximately half of all studies was to promote or accelerate healing of a bony defect (103/197, 52%) or treat non-union (93/103, 47%), with further information available in S3 Table . The majority of therapies (179/204 (88%)) were only evaluated once, while five interventions (chitosan [ 18 23 ], adipose stromal cells [ 24 27 ], erythropoietin [ 28 31 ], vascular endothelial growth factor [ 32 – 35 ] and SDF-1 [ 36 38 ]) were investigated by multiple studies ( Table 3 ). Chitosan as a single therapy was evaluated by six studies: four of these found significantly greater bone formation in the intervention group compared to control [ 18 , 20 22 ], with further detail in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of approximately half of all studies was to promote or accelerate healing of a bony defect (103/197, 52%) or treat non-union (93/103, 47%), with further information available in S3 Table . The majority of therapies (179/204 (88%)) were only evaluated once, while five interventions (chitosan [ 18 23 ], adipose stromal cells [ 24 27 ], erythropoietin [ 28 31 ], vascular endothelial growth factor [ 32 – 35 ] and SDF-1 [ 36 38 ]) were investigated by multiple studies ( Table 3 ). Chitosan as a single therapy was evaluated by six studies: four of these found significantly greater bone formation in the intervention group compared to control [ 18 , 20 22 ], with further detail in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcium phosphate ceramics have been extensively used to produce porous scaffolds due to their bone-like chemical composition as well as excellent biological properties, including biocompatibility and osteoconductivity [8][9][10][11]. The use of these bioceramics was always restricted because of its fragility and the weak rupture resistance [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo tests prove the fact that the treat surfaces can generate a better and faster osseointegration, in comparison with the even surfaces. From a clinical point of view, several studies have reported that on a long term the failure rate is lower in the case of the rough implants because they ensure the adhesion, the osteoblast cells proliferation and differentiation at the metal-bone interface [7,8,9,10,11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%