2016
DOI: 10.3390/v8120340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Cellular Decapping Activators by Positive-Strand RNA Viruses

Abstract: Positive-strand RNA viruses have evolved multiple strategies to not only circumvent the hostile decay machinery but to trick it into being a priceless collaborator supporting viral RNA translation and replication. In this review, we describe the versatile interaction of positive-strand RNA viruses and the 5′-3′ mRNA decay machinery with a focus on the viral subversion of decapping activators. This highly conserved viral trickery is exemplified with the plant Brome mosaic virus, the animal Flock house virus and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lsm1 protein is part of the complex of cellular mRNA decapping activators employed by positive-strand RNA viruses to promote their translation and replication (reviewed in Jungfleisch et al, 2016) and might stabilize orthopoxviral mRNAs containing 5′ poly(A) leaders (Bergman et al, 2007). Despite many similarities between poxviral and pGKL-encoded transcription and RNA-modification apparatuses (Jeske et al, 2007), the simplest explanation for the increased pGKL toxin production in the K. lactis lsm1 Δ strain might be the stabilization of pGKL mRNAs in the absence of Lsm1p due to prominent involvement of the Lsm1 protein in a cytoplasmic deadenylation-dependent mRNA decay pathway (reviewed in Parker, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lsm1 protein is part of the complex of cellular mRNA decapping activators employed by positive-strand RNA viruses to promote their translation and replication (reviewed in Jungfleisch et al, 2016) and might stabilize orthopoxviral mRNAs containing 5′ poly(A) leaders (Bergman et al, 2007). Despite many similarities between poxviral and pGKL-encoded transcription and RNA-modification apparatuses (Jeske et al, 2007), the simplest explanation for the increased pGKL toxin production in the K. lactis lsm1 Δ strain might be the stabilization of pGKL mRNAs in the absence of Lsm1p due to prominent involvement of the Lsm1 protein in a cytoplasmic deadenylation-dependent mRNA decay pathway (reviewed in Parker, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased toxin production by the slow-growing K. lactis IFO1267 pbp1Δ pab1Δ strain was more noticeable when toxin production to the culture medium was quantified as the diameter of the inhibition zone on the lawn of the sensitive yeast strain per production cell (Figs. 7A, S1) The Lsm1 protein is part of the complex of cellular mRNA decapping activators employed by positive-strand viruses to promote their translation and replication (reviewed in (124)) and might stabilize orthopoxviral mRNAs containing 5' poly(A) leaders (39). Despite the many similarities between poxviruses and the apparatuses of pGKL transcription and RNA modification (22), the simplest explanation for increased pGKL toxin production in the lsm1Δ strain might be the stabilization of pGKL mRNAs in the cell due to prominent involvement of the Lsm1 protein in a cytoplasmic deadenylation-dependent mRNA decay pathway (reviewed in (125)).…”
Section: Pab1 and Lsm1 Deletions Support The Translation Of Pgkl Mrnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that the positive effect of the complex on viral translation requires its RNA‐binding activity, but how this mediates BMV RNA circularization to facilitate translation is not clear. Regarding replication, at least four positive strand viruses infecting plants, insects and humans rely on the Pat1/Lsm1‐7 complex (Jungfleisch et al ); reviewed (Jungfleisch et al )). Interestingly, the bacterial Lsm1 homologue, Hfq, which forms hexameric rings, has been characterized as the host factor for RNA bacteriophage Qb replication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%