1988
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1988-0375.ch009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Catalysts To Reduce SOx Emissions from Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible causes thought to be responsible for SO x additives deactivation include (a) reduction of the uptake area and sintering, which can reduce the oxidation activity, , (b) Si migration from the catalyst to the additive, reducing the uptake sites, (c) V migration from the catalyst to the additive, eliminating adsorption surface sites, mainly for additives not containing V, and (d) formation of stable sulfate on the additive, eliminating adsorption. , Most of these causes were demonstrated in conditions or tests that tried to simulate the regenerator environments. Hence, a couple of factors occurred together and their relative effects could not be isolated and compared directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible causes thought to be responsible for SO x additives deactivation include (a) reduction of the uptake area and sintering, which can reduce the oxidation activity, , (b) Si migration from the catalyst to the additive, reducing the uptake sites, (c) V migration from the catalyst to the additive, eliminating adsorption surface sites, mainly for additives not containing V, and (d) formation of stable sulfate on the additive, eliminating adsorption. , Most of these causes were demonstrated in conditions or tests that tried to simulate the regenerator environments. Hence, a couple of factors occurred together and their relative effects could not be isolated and compared directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%