1974
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600050176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of carcass measurements to predict total edible meat in Mexican commercial cattle

Abstract: SUMMARYCarcass measurements have been used by various authors to predict total edible meat content of carcasses.Measurements were made on 180 commercial quality cattle of different phenotypes and sexes in a commercial slaughterhouse in Monterrey, N.L. Measurements were carcass weight, length, forequarter depth, side circumference, length of leg, length of forearm, leg shape, area of m.l.d. and total dissected meat. Multiple regressions were computed for both linear and allometric equations using a CDC 3300 com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all forms of the equation, carcass weight accounts for the majority of the total variance. This is in agreement with results generally obtained and with those obtained by the present authors working with Mexican commercial quality cattle (Butterworth et al 1974). It is unusual, however, that the linear form of the evaluation gives a more accurate prediction than the allometric form (see Seebeck, 1968, and results of Butterworth et al 1974).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In all forms of the equation, carcass weight accounts for the majority of the total variance. This is in agreement with results generally obtained and with those obtained by the present authors working with Mexican commercial quality cattle (Butterworth et al 1974). It is unusual, however, that the linear form of the evaluation gives a more accurate prediction than the allometric form (see Seebeck, 1968, and results of Butterworth et al 1974).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in agreement with results generally obtained and with those obtained by the present authors working with Mexican commercial quality cattle (Butterworth et al 1974). It is unusual, however, that the linear form of the evaluation gives a more accurate prediction than the allometric form (see Seebeck, 1968, and results of Butterworth et al 1974). Luitingh (1962) has stated that 'the sigmoid shape of the (growth) curve can only be evident if the time range is very wide.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations