1988
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1988-0382.ch026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Biological Monitoring Data from Pesticide Users in Making Pesticide Regulatory Decisions in California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WBD may be a suitable means to quantitatively collect chemicals such as pesticides and some of their degradation derivatives, and when combined with estimates of human percutaneous absorption, may be used to estimate AD. The California Department of Food and Agriculture ( CDFA ) recognized a need for exposure data for farm workers (Maddy et al, 1989 ) and has used WBD for agricultural field reentry studies. Studies conducted by the CDFA in indoor environments used a tight-fitting WBD as a surrogate for skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WBD may be a suitable means to quantitatively collect chemicals such as pesticides and some of their degradation derivatives, and when combined with estimates of human percutaneous absorption, may be used to estimate AD. The California Department of Food and Agriculture ( CDFA ) recognized a need for exposure data for farm workers (Maddy et al, 1989 ) and has used WBD for agricultural field reentry studies. Studies conducted by the CDFA in indoor environments used a tight-fitting WBD as a surrogate for skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inaccurate estimates of exposure to reach safety and regulatory decisions that can result from less direct methods of exposure assessment should be avoided. As an example, a study of Maddy et al [1989] showed that metabolite measurements in urine were considerably lower than predictions of human exposure based on external exposure measurements for exposure of applicators and harvest workers to captan in strawberry fields. Research on associations between dermal exposure in sprayers and absorption of pesticides often has shown poor results [Fenske, 1988;Chester and Hart, 1986;Franklin et al, 19811.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some field studies have attempted to associate environmental measurements with biomonitoring data to assess captan exposure (Hansen et al, 1978;Winterlin et al, 1984;Winterlin et al, 1986;Maddy et al, 1989;Lavy et al, 1993;de Cock et al, 1995;Krieger and Dinoff, 2000;Hines et al, 2008), but poor correlations were obtained. These studies, as well as those of van Welie et al (1991) and of Verberk et al (1990) which used only biomonitoring, assessed worker exposure for a maximum three consecutive days, with incomplete collections; typical tasks involving potential exposure to captan (e.g.…”
Section: Captanmentioning
confidence: 99%