2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Bayesian networks classifiers for long-term mean wind turbine energy output estimation at a potential wind energy conversion site

Abstract: Due to the interannual variability of wind speed a feasibility analysis for the installation of a Wind Energy Conversion System at a particular site requires estimation of the long-term mean wind turbine energy output. A method is proposed in this paper which, based on probabilistic Bayesian networks (BNs), enables estimation of the long-term mean wind speed histogram for a site where few measurements of the wind resource are available. For this purpose, the proposed method allows the use of multiple reference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative specific neural or kernel-based classifiers have been tested, such as in [33], where a classification algorithm based on a Bayesian neural network is proposed for long-term wind speed prediction. The long-term wind speed prediction problem is modeled as a classification problem with k classes, corresponding to different (discrete) wind speeds at a given study zone.…”
Section: Classification Problems and Algorithms In Wind Speed/power Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative specific neural or kernel-based classifiers have been tested, such as in [33], where a classification algorithm based on a Bayesian neural network is proposed for long-term wind speed prediction. The long-term wind speed prediction problem is modeled as a classification problem with k classes, corresponding to different (discrete) wind speeds at a given study zone.…”
Section: Classification Problems and Algorithms In Wind Speed/power Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem Specific Methodology Used [3] 2015 Sea wave Ordinal classification SVM, ANN, LR [4] 2015 Solar Classification SVM [5] 2009 Power disturbance Classification SVM, wavelets [10] 2015 Wind Optimization Bio-inspired, meta-heuristics [14] 2015 Wind Classification Fuzzy SVM [15] 2011 Wind Classification DT, SOM [16] 2015 Wind Classification SVM, k-NN, fuzzy, ANN [17] 2010 Solar Classification Semi-supervised SVM [20] 2013 Wind Ordinal classification SVM, DT, LR, HMM [30] 2014 Wind Classification SVM, LR, RF, rotation forest [31] 2011 Wind Classification ANN, LR, DT, RF [32] 2013 Wind Classification k-NN, RBF, DT [33] 2011 Wind Classification, regression BN [34] 2014 Wind Classification, regression Heuristic methodology: WPPT [35] 2011 Wind Classification Bagging, ripper, rotation forest, RF, k-NN [36] 2013 Wind Classification ANFIS, ANN [37] 2012 Wind Classification SVM [38] 2015 Wind Classification ANN, SVM [39] 2015 Wind Classification PNN [40] 2015 Wind Classification DT, BN, RF [41] 2015 Wind Classification, clustering AuDyC [42] 2016 Wind Classification, clustering AuDyC [43] 2010 Power disturbance Classification HMM, SVM, ANN [44] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM, NN, fuzzy, neuro-fuzzy, wavelets, GA [45] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM, k-NN, ANN, fuzzy, wavelets [46] 2002 Power disturbance Classification Rule-based classifiers, wavelets, HMM [47] 2004 Power disturbance Classification PNN [48] 2006 Power disturbance Classification ANN, RBF, SVM [49] 2007 Power disturbance Classification ANN, wavelets [50] 2012 Power disturbance Classification PNN [51] 2014 Power disturbance Classification ANN Table 3. Summary of the main references analyzed, grouped by application field, problem type and methodologies considered (II)...…”
Section: Reference Year Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of another parent only adds unnecessary complexity and increases the number of network parameters. Consequently, other authors [4,5,6,28,8] have proposed the use of more sophisticated methods to overcome these shortcomings, among which are: the use of the K2 algorithms [6,24,25,26,27,28,10,4], the Genetic Search [7,4], the Greedy Search [11,4], the Annealing Simulated [8,4], the Greedy Hill Climber [7,4] and the Repeated Hill Climber [7,4]. Although these algorithms have actually managed to attain performant classifiers, their application has resulted in the frequently and commonly encountered problem of structure-learning computational complexity owing to the increase in the number of descriptive variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional Measure Correlate Predict (MCP) algorithms [5][6][7] and methods which use Machine Learning [8][9][10][11][12] are the most commonly used techniques to generate the models in the estimation processes. The former generally use a single reference station to generate the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%