1975
DOI: 10.1029/rs010i011p00935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of atmospheric emission to estimate refractive errors in a non‐horizontally stratified troposphere

Abstract: Tropospheric refraction introduces errors into radar and radio communication systems by causing radio waves to travel along a curved path and at a speed which changes with position. Common error correction techniques, such as making estimates of refractive effects from surface refractivity, rely implicitly on the assumption that the troposphere is horizontally stratified. This study demonstrates that such an assumption may be unwarranted especially at elevation angles below 10°, and that such reliance can lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The departure of the measurements reported by Anway from the surface correction model can be attributed to the effects of large scale horizontal variations in refractive index, the problem described by Gallop and Telford (1975). The increase in variance about the correction model observed in this study was comparable to the variance about the mean value of elevation error observed within an hour and previously reported by Crane (1976b), The source of this increased variability relative to the results reported by…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The departure of the measurements reported by Anway from the surface correction model can be attributed to the effects of large scale horizontal variations in refractive index, the problem described by Gallop and Telford (1975). The increase in variance about the correction model observed in this study was comparable to the variance about the mean value of elevation error observed within an hour and previously reported by Crane (1976b), The source of this increased variability relative to the results reported by…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The surface correction scheme did not work as well as expected based on the simulation analysis. Sine the earlier analysis of Haystack observations (Crane, 1976b) A number of simulation studies were made in the late 1950's to evaluate the seriousness of refraction induced errors and to provide possible procedures for refraction correction Thayer, 1954, Bauer et al, 1958;Bean et al, 1960 Gallop and Telford (1975) simulated the effects of horizontal inhomogeneity and reported that correction based on only surface refractivity measurements would not be as successful as expected for a horizontally homogeneous atmosphere. They suggested that the effects of horizontal variation would be small at a So elevation angle and negligible at 10, not sufficient to explain the Anway results.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of an effective earth radius was introduced by Schelleng et al, [1933] and is also found in the works of Elmore [1975], Inoue [1975], Comit• Consultatif International des Radiocommunications (CCIR) [1978a], and Sasaki and Akiyarna [1979]. The use of Snell's law for rays refracted in a spherical atmosphere is applied by Schulkin [1952], Bean and Thayer [1959], Bean [1964], Armand and Kolosov [1965], Thayer [1967], Blake [1968], Bean and Dutton [1968], Plotnikov [1975], Gallop and Telford [1975], and Vickers and Lopez 1-1975].…”
Section: Standard Ray Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 93%