1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-3840(66)80010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of artificial materials in surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

1968
1968
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Most authors believe that the trauma of the operative procedure itself is a sufficiently inflammatory stimulus. 34 It may be that the specifications for the best possible implant material have not yet been established. Perhaps the ideal implant material might combine reasonable cost, soundness and homogeneity, abrasion and wear resistance, and mechanical properties suited to use, with antibacterial activity, optimal inflammatory activity, and optimal host receptivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Most authors believe that the trauma of the operative procedure itself is a sufficiently inflammatory stimulus. 34 It may be that the specifications for the best possible implant material have not yet been established. Perhaps the ideal implant material might combine reasonable cost, soundness and homogeneity, abrasion and wear resistance, and mechanical properties suited to use, with antibacterial activity, optimal inflammatory activity, and optimal host receptivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoration of blood-flow to the profunda femoris artery in patients with iliac or common femoral combined with superficial femoral occlusions has been shown to be effective by many authors (Morris, Edwards, Cooley, Crawford, and DeBakey, 1961;Leeds and Gilfillan, 1961;Darling and Linton, 1964;Wesolowski, Martinez, Domingo, Fries, Schaefer, Sawyer, Gillie, and McMahon, 1966). Benson and others (1966) found that the results of aorta to popliteal reconsuuction were so poor as to be unjustified and that aorta to profunda reconstruction would achieve an almost comparable and lasting result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison with a reservoir a t t = 33.97 sec, the following were found: (1) within sT2 the dish could be equilibrated with the reservoir; (2) after equilibration, if the cover was removed, a highly reproducible S-A loss occurred which was 3.1% of 7 ; ( 3 ) after equilibration, if the dish plus cover was emptied and refilled, a highly reproducible S-W loss of 0.54y0 of 7 occurred; and (4) after equilibration, if the dish plus cover was emptied, dried for 10 min, and refilled, a reproducible loss of 1.3y0 of 7 occurred: drying evidently increases the reintroduction of adsorptive capacity. Vessels may also be compared by calculating specific losses in mg T/m2.…”
Section: Quantitative Measurements Of Thrombin Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The side-arm syringe was used and all reservoirs assayed against single sets of 7-tubes. From a series of comparisons we can obtain: (1) the rate and variance of thrombin instability (denaturation) ; ( 2 ) the reservoir reproducibility on any one day; (3) the day-to-day reproducibility in preparing thrombins; and (4) the sum of s,2 (on one day) plus day-to-day reproducibility in preparing sets of r-tubes.…”
Section: Day-to-day Variance (~2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation