2013
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Antihypertensive Medications and Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Aged 55 to 74 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
117
2
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
117
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these findings were not supported by subsequent observational studies [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis [24] also confirmed that no excess incidence of cancer could be imputed to CCBs and other antihypertensive classes. Interestingly, however, a recent population-based case-control study in the three-county Seattle-Puget Sound metropolitan area conducted among women aged 55 to 74 years found that current use of CCBs was associated with higher risks of both ductal and lobular breast cancer, whilst other antihypertensive drug classes were not associated with risk [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nevertheless, these findings were not supported by subsequent observational studies [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis [24] also confirmed that no excess incidence of cancer could be imputed to CCBs and other antihypertensive classes. Interestingly, however, a recent population-based case-control study in the three-county Seattle-Puget Sound metropolitan area conducted among women aged 55 to 74 years found that current use of CCBs was associated with higher risks of both ductal and lobular breast cancer, whilst other antihypertensive drug classes were not associated with risk [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, many epidemiological studies have supported the antineoplastic effects of β-blocker use [1]. However, some others revealed negative results, adding to the confusion regarding their potential benefit in cancer patients [2,3]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, left ventricular hypertrophy should not be dismissed as a minor condition. Recognizing left ventricular hypertrophy is relevant to oncologists because arterial hypertension is highly prevalent among cancer patients and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk [19,20,21,22]. In this study, the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy was associated with NT-proBNP >100 pg/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%