2020
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1807546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of ANN and visual-manual classification for prediction of soil properties for paving purposes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the proposed system introduced in this study, a comparison was accompanied with results presented in [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], where ANN and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was adopted to identify the soil types or soil properties as shown in Table 2 . The MSE/root MSE (RMSE), coefficient of determination, ANN inputs related to soil property such as Red, Blue, and Green colors, and ANN structure were considered for comparative purpose, where the values in these parameters were obtained from the computations in previous works and introduced in their results.…”
Section: Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the proposed system introduced in this study, a comparison was accompanied with results presented in [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], where ANN and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was adopted to identify the soil types or soil properties as shown in Table 2 . The MSE/root MSE (RMSE), coefficient of determination, ANN inputs related to soil property such as Red, Blue, and Green colors, and ANN structure were considered for comparative purpose, where the values in these parameters were obtained from the computations in previous works and introduced in their results.…”
Section: Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Reference No. of inputs to ANN ANN structure MSE/RMSE (Training) MSE/RMSE (Testing) R 2 [ 43 ]/2018 (ANN) 3 (R, G, B) 3:1:60 1 × 10 −4 1 × 10 −4# 0.99 [ 44 ]/2017 (ANN) 8 (R, G, B, NIR, FC, NDVI, EVI, VHI) 8:14:10 0.05 ---- 0.94 [ 45 ]/2019 (ANN) 3 (R, G, B) 3:1:60 6.55 × 10 −4 5.25 × 10 −4# 0.99 [ 46 ]/2019 (CNN) 3 (R, G, B) Several layers --- 3.27∗ 0.96 [ 47 ]/2020 (CNN) 6 (soil property) Several layers --- 4.8∗ 0.86 [ 48 ]/2019 (CNN) Soil spectral data Several layers ---- 7.55∗ 0.7 [ 49 ]/2017 (ANN) 4 4:8:6:14 0.181∗ 0.163∗ 0.93 [ 50 ]/2020 (ANN) 5 (Color, Gravel, Sand, Silt Clay) 5:1:10 0.041 # 0.045 # 0.99 ANFIS (gebellmf) 3 (R, G, B) No. of mfs (3 3 3) 3.388 × 10 −3 3.378 × 10 −3 0.94 ANFIS (gebellmf) 3 (R, G, B) No.…”
Section: Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alawi and Rajab (2013) utilised multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis to predict the CBR of the unreinforced subbase soil layer. Recently, similar applications of advanced ML techniques for the prediction of CBR of different unreinforced soils were also conducted by other researchers (Erzin and Turkoz 2016, González Farias et al 2018, de Souza et al 2020, Nagaraju et al 2020, Tenpe and Patel 2020. Similarly, several studies were also carried out to evaluate permanent deformation and resilient modulus of recycled demolition wastes in pavements using ML algorithms (Arulrajah et al 2013, Ullah et al 2020, Ghorbani et al 2020a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Guilherme (2016), baseado em projetos geotécnicos do Rio Grande do Norte realizou a predição da classificação AASHTO e do CBR a partir de variáveis biofísicas, geomorfométricas, de localização e de técnicas de modelagem como Regressão Múltipla e Redes Neurais Artificiais -RNA. Souza et al (2020), elaboraram um banco de dados de amostras de solos oriundos do Ceará e realizou a predição de modelos de Classificação AASHTO e CBR, utilizando a classificação tátil-visual como variáveis preditoras e RNA como técnica de modelagem.…”
Section: Fundamentação Teórica E Metodologiaunclassified