2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an Ultrathin vs Thin Bronchoscope for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
99
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Third, despite the limitations of evaluating efficacy in a pilot study, we feel that the diagnostic yield of 74% achieved in this study with new technology compares favorably with recent publications of established technologies that have largely shown lower diagnostic yields when similarly strict definitions were applied in randomized controlled studies. Although Oki et al 16 reported a diagnostic yield of 70% using ultrathin bronchoscopy, virtual bronchoscopic navigation, and radial ultrasound imaging for pulmonary nodules, a prospective, randomized controlled trial that compared thin bronchoscopy with R-EBUS to conventional transbronchial biopsy with fluoroscopy demonstrated a diagnostic yield of 49% for guided bronchoscopy, which was not statistically different from the yield of conventional bronchoscopy. 2 An additional large prospective observational study that used similar definitions reported a diagnostic yield of 57% among patients who were undergoing various guided bronchoscopic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…15 Third, despite the limitations of evaluating efficacy in a pilot study, we feel that the diagnostic yield of 74% achieved in this study with new technology compares favorably with recent publications of established technologies that have largely shown lower diagnostic yields when similarly strict definitions were applied in randomized controlled studies. Although Oki et al 16 reported a diagnostic yield of 70% using ultrathin bronchoscopy, virtual bronchoscopic navigation, and radial ultrasound imaging for pulmonary nodules, a prospective, randomized controlled trial that compared thin bronchoscopy with R-EBUS to conventional transbronchial biopsy with fluoroscopy demonstrated a diagnostic yield of 49% for guided bronchoscopy, which was not statistically different from the yield of conventional bronchoscopy. 2 An additional large prospective observational study that used similar definitions reported a diagnostic yield of 57% among patients who were undergoing various guided bronchoscopic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…200 The role of ultrathin bronchoscope was examined in a randomized trial in patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions 30 mm in diameter. 201 The patients were randomized to undergo virtual bronchoscopy, R-EBUS, fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy using a 3.0-mm ultrathin bronchoscope or a 4.0mm thin bronchoscope. In the thin bronchoscope group, the use of small forceps with a guide-sheath (GS) or standard forceps without the GS was permitted.…”
Section: Section 6 Diagnostic Methods For Screen-detected Lung Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure duration was significantly shorter in the ultrathin bronchoscope group (median, 24.8 vs. 26.8 min, respectively; P ¼ 0 .008). 201 An earlier meta-analysis of various guided bronchoscopy techniques for biopsy of pulmonary nodules had reported a pooled diagnostic yield of 70% (yield 61% for lesions <2 cm and 82% for lesions >2 cm). 202 The pneumothorax rate was 1.6% with 0.7% for pneumothorax requiring drainage.…”
Section: Section 6 Diagnostic Methods For Screen-detected Lung Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult for the bronchoscopy to reach most nodules, and the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic-guided lung biopsy ranged from 58 to 70%. 3,4 The diagnostic yield might be even lower if bronchoscopy is applied to nodules less than 10 mm. Performing CT-guided needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules is also often difficult, especially when the nodule is less than 15 mm, or has predominantly ground glass opacity (GGO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%