1986
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(198610)23:4<353::aid-pits2310230406>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an abbreviated version of the WISC-R with learning disabled children

Abstract: The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) was administered to 56 learning disabled children, using standard assessment procedures and format as outlined by Wechsler. Abbreviated IQ scores were then derived by applying the Kennedy-Elder formula, an equation that uses five WISC-R subtests with varied weightings. Comparisons between the standard IQ scores and the abbreviated IQ scores were evaluated. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of .83 and a nonsignificant t-test between th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short forms selected for investigation were as follows: -The five-subtest short form of the WISC-R (Information, Block Design, Comprehension, Picture Arrangement, and Coding) first proposed by Kennedy and Elder (1982) and since employed by Beck et al (1983), Phelps and Rosso (1986), Vollmerhausen et al (1986), Wade, Phelps, and Falasco (1986), and Zimet, Farley, and Dahlem (1985). This short form was chosen because of its current popularity and also because Zimet et al (1985) took the unusual step of obtaining multiple regression weights based on their own data.…”
Section: Subjects and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short forms selected for investigation were as follows: -The five-subtest short form of the WISC-R (Information, Block Design, Comprehension, Picture Arrangement, and Coding) first proposed by Kennedy and Elder (1982) and since employed by Beck et al (1983), Phelps and Rosso (1986), Vollmerhausen et al (1986), Wade, Phelps, and Falasco (1986), and Zimet, Farley, and Dahlem (1985). This short form was chosen because of its current popularity and also because Zimet et al (1985) took the unusual step of obtaining multiple regression weights based on their own data.…”
Section: Subjects and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%