Use of Allogeneic Bone Graft in Maxillary Reconstruction for Installation of Dental Implants

Gomes, Kelston Ulbricht; Carlini, João Luiz; Biron, C R; Rapoport, Abrão; Dedivitis, Rogério Aparecido

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.006

Cited by 82 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Details of all included studies were summarized in Table 1. Reasons for exclusion were case reports or <10 subjects included (5) [22, 41–44], and systematic/narrative reviews (2) [35, 36]. In addition, four more studies were excluded due to not clearly displaying appropriate data or to providing lack of the required data for this systematic review [23, 34, 45, 46].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Monje

Pikos²,

Chan

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. This systematic review was aimed at assessing the feasibility by means of survival rate, histologic analysis, and causes of failure of allogeneic block grafts for augmenting the atrophic maxilla. Material and Methods. A literature search was conducted by one reviewer in several databases. Articles were included in this systematic review if they were human clinical trials in which outcomes of allogeneic bone block grafts were studied by means of survival rate. In addition other factors were extracted in order to assess their influence upon graft failure. Results. Fifteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and subsequently were analyzed in this systematic review. A total of 361 block grafts could be followed 4 to 9 months after the surgery, of which 9 (2.4%) failed within 1 month to 2 months after the surgery. Additionally, a weighed mean 4.79 mm (95% CI: 4.51–5.08) horizontal bone gain was computed from 119 grafted sites in 5 studies. Regarding implant cumulative survival rate, the weighed mean was 96.9% (95% CI: 92.8–98.7%), computed from 228 implants over a mean follow-up period of 23.9 months. Histologic analysis showed that allogeneic block grafts behave differently in the early stages of healing when compared to autogenous block grafts. Conclusion. Atrophied maxillary reconstruction with allogeneic bone block grafts represents a reliable option as shown by low block graft failure rate, minimal resorption, and high implant survival rate.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Monje

Pikos²,

Chan

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4,[23][24][25] The benefits of demineralized bone matrix with corticocancellous chips include its unlimited supply, its combined osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties (due to bioactive growth factors bone morphogenetic protein-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor-α, and transforming growth factor-β1), and absence of donor-site morbidity to the patient. 25 The combination of demineralized bone matrix and allograft bone has been used successfully in pediatric patients without growth abnormalities, but its use thus far has been limited.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Failed Alveolar Bone Grafts

Sivak

MacIsaac

Rottgers

et al. 2014

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 2008, Gomes and Stacchi, observed that when FFB was used alone, it may promote bone formation safely without interference with bone the regeneration processes and implant osseointegration (Gomes et al, 2008;Stacchi et al, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical, histological and histomorphometrical study of maxillary sinus augmentation using cortico-cancellous fresh frozen bone chips

Acocella

Bertolai

Nissan

et al. 2011

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use of Allogeneic Bone Graft in Maxillary Reconstruction for Installation of Dental Implants

Cited by 82 publications

References 6 publications

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Management of Failed Alveolar Bone Grafts

Clinical, histological and histomorphometrical study of maxillary sinus augmentation using cortico-cancellous fresh frozen bone chips

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About