2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04397.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of affinity‐directed liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry to map the epitopes of a factor VIII inhibitor antibody fraction

Abstract: Summary Background Neutralizing factor (F) VIII antibodies develop in ~30% of individuals with hemophilia A and show specificity to multiple sites in the FVIII protein. Methods Reactive epitopes to an immobilized IgG fraction prepared from a high-titer, FVIII inhibitor plasma were determined following immuno-precipitation (IP) of tryptic and chymotryptic peptides derived from digests of the A1 and A2 subunits of FVIIIa and FVIII light chain. Peptides were detected and identified using highly sensitive liqui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of mass spectrometric epitope‐mapping procedures, epitope excision and/or extraction have been the methods of choice for studying such noncovalent molecular antigen antibody interactions . The antibody/peptide ratio differed from report to report including examples where excess of antibody over the antigen varied over broad ranges, whereas in other studies, antigens were used in excess to antibody . In most of these published methods, fairly large amounts of antibodies (about 300–6000 pmol) were consumed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of mass spectrometric epitope‐mapping procedures, epitope excision and/or extraction have been the methods of choice for studying such noncovalent molecular antigen antibody interactions . The antibody/peptide ratio differed from report to report including examples where excess of antibody over the antigen varied over broad ranges, whereas in other studies, antigens were used in excess to antibody . In most of these published methods, fairly large amounts of antibodies (about 300–6000 pmol) were consumed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are several software tools available that can be used to apply different calculation methods to proteins allowing the prediction of a protein structure and study of the molecular interactions between proteins. Empirically, the interactions between proteins can be studied from several experimental techniques, such as alanine scanning, peptide panning, yeast two-hybrid systems [58], affinity purification/mass spectrometry [59], and protein microarrays [60]. A number of computational methods for prediction of protein/protein interactions have been developed in the recent years [61, 62].…”
Section: Computational Data: Il-23/adnectin 2 Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting materials, such as Sepharose beads (Suckau et al, 1990;Papac et al, 1994;Hochleitner et al, 2000;Griffiths et al, 2011) and magnetic beads (Lu et al, 1998;Jankovicova et al, 2008), are available for covalent attachment of antibodies, through which the specificity of an affinity chromatography system is provided. Alternatively, noncovalent immobilization of antibodies on protein A and/or protein G´in columns/pipette tips (Zhao and Chait, 1994;AlMajdoub et al, 2013b) or by immunoprecipitation (Ansong et al, 2006) has been applied successfully for antibody-antigen or epitope mapping studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%