2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2021.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of affect context in dyadic interactions for continuous emotion recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, there are different methods in the context of human emotions recognition. For instance, by tracking implicit parameters, including, speech recognition [13], [14] facial expression recognition [15]- [17], physiological means [18], [19] body gesture recognition [20] or multimodal or fusion means [12], [21], [22]. While some sensory cues such as speech, body language, and physiological measures, may not yet be realistically and decipherable by a computer as effortless as the human does, the facial expression could be applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, there are different methods in the context of human emotions recognition. For instance, by tracking implicit parameters, including, speech recognition [13], [14] facial expression recognition [15]- [17], physiological means [18], [19] body gesture recognition [20] or multimodal or fusion means [12], [21], [22]. While some sensory cues such as speech, body language, and physiological measures, may not yet be realistically and decipherable by a computer as effortless as the human does, the facial expression could be applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the interaction between Individual Emotion and Conversation Valence was not found in the hypothesised form. The current study found that for Anger, Disgust and Surprise, the models just It is also possible that the conversation topic and the emotional states of the participants in each dyad influenced the emotional states of each other (Fatima & Erzin, 2021). Each participant's data were stacked on each other in the machine learning models.…”
Section: The Interaction Between Context and Individual Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 96%