1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb00959.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of adoptive transfer of T‐cell antigen‐receptor‐transgenic T cells for the study of T‐cell activation in vivo

Abstract: Adoptive transfer of TCR-transgenic T cells uniformly expressing an identifiable TCR of known peptide/MHC specificity can be used to monitor the in vivo behavior of antigen-specific T cells. We have used this system to show that naive T cells are initially activated within the T-cell zones of secondary lymphoid tissue to proliferate in a B7-dependent manner. If adjuvants or inflammatory cytokines are present during this period, enhanced numbers of T cells accumulate, migrate into B-cell-rich follicles, and acq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
142
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
142
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, our observation that TS1 hosts reject MHC disparate allografts in 10 days compared with an average of 28 days for HA104 graft rejection was unexpected in light of the fact that the precursor frequency of T cells reactive for the allogeneic donor is likely to be many fold lower than the frequency of HA-specific T cells in TS1 recipients. Although differences in Ag density (HA vs Allo-MHC) on the graft could contribute to this result, an alternate hypothesis is that rejection of HA grafts by TS1 hosts is impeded by too high a frequency of responding T cells (43). In support of the latter possibility is our finding that HA104 graft rejection is typically more rapid following transfer of a small number of TS1 T cells to BALB/c hosts than in naive TS1 recipients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In fact, our observation that TS1 hosts reject MHC disparate allografts in 10 days compared with an average of 28 days for HA104 graft rejection was unexpected in light of the fact that the precursor frequency of T cells reactive for the allogeneic donor is likely to be many fold lower than the frequency of HA-specific T cells in TS1 recipients. Although differences in Ag density (HA vs Allo-MHC) on the graft could contribute to this result, an alternate hypothesis is that rejection of HA grafts by TS1 hosts is impeded by too high a frequency of responding T cells (43). In support of the latter possibility is our finding that HA104 graft rejection is typically more rapid following transfer of a small number of TS1 T cells to BALB/c hosts than in naive TS1 recipients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…injection) of OVA or OVA 323-339 in this T cell transfer model induced a rapid, strong, transient DO11.10 T cell proliferation, resulting in a state of nonresponsiveness of these T cells upon subsequent challenge in vivo or in vitro. Moreover, they described that the induction of a more local and less transient response, by s.c. administration of OVA 323-339 in CFA, resulted in a significantly enhanced T cell response upon in vitro stimulation with OVA 323-339 (19,24). Previously, we described that successful immunotherapy was associated with decreased Th2 responses (9, 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A commonly used alternative to visualize Th cell responses in mice is the adoptive transfer of traceable populations of TCR-transgenic T cells into congenic mice [25]. This method is especially important to allow tracking of early differentiation events of naive T cells, which are too few in number to be followed in a nonmanipulated immune system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%